Skip to main content

Is nearsnet.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 宁波邻家网络科技有限公司 Reviews

nearsnet.com favicon

Is nearsnet.com Safe? Security Analysis for 宁波邻家网络科技有限公司

Check if nearsnet.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinamedium
HTML5CSS3JavaScript
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 1:57:09 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

宁波邻家网络科技有限公司是一家成立于2011年的专业二维码云服务提供商,运营草料二维码平台,拥有庞大的注册用户基础和企业客户。公司专注于二维码技术研发和应用,参与国家二维码标准制定,市场份额领先。技术基础较为传统,采用标准HTML5和CSS3技术,托管于阿里云,网站性能和移动优化表现良好。安全方面,网站缺少安全头和HTTPS强制策略,未公开隐私或安全政策,存在合规风险。整体网站内容专业且可信,面向企业用户,符合中国市场需求。

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

公司通过草料二维码平台提供二维码制作、管理及定制服务,目标客户为企业及开发者。其市场领先地位和技术积累构成竞争优势。业务模式以SaaS和定制开发为主,拥有微信认证小程序授权资质,拓展小程序二维码服务。公司公开联系方式和备案信息,显示合规运营。合作伙伴域名cli.im为核心业务平台。缺乏公开隐私和安全政策,建议加强合规建设以提升客户信任。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

m*****@nears.cn
h*****@nears.cn

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

当前安全成熟度中等,网站未启用DNSSEC,缺少安全HTTP头,未公开安全响应政策,存在潜在安全隐患。无明显漏洞或敏感信息泄露,HTTPS使用情况未明确。缺少安全事件响应联系方式和漏洞披露渠道,安全文化和合规性有待提升。建议启用DNSSEC,完善HTTPS配置,增加安全头,发布安全政策和漏洞响应机制,提升整体安全防护能力。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

启用DNSSEC以增强域名解析安全。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

宁波邻家网络科技有限公司

Description:

宁波邻家网络科技有限公司是一家专业的二维码云服务提供商,成立于2011年,运营草料二维码平台,拥有800多万注册用户和数万家付费企业,提供二维码管理系统、行业解决方案和定制开发服务。

Key Services:
二维码制作二维码管理系统二维码行业解决方案小程序参数码生成工具
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status OK
  • No DNSSEC enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'mail' uses 384-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.sendcloud.org ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(384-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 47 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(227 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:47.98.112.192
Name Servers:
f1g1ns1.dnspod.net
f1g1ns2.dnspod.net
MX Records:
5: mx.sendcloud.org
SOA:Serial: 1726852044, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:49ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.sendcloud.org ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站采用基础HTML5和CSS3技术,无明显现代框架或CMS,托管于阿里云,性能适中,移动端优化良好。缺少高级技术栈和自动化工具,存在技术现代化机会。SEO基础良好,元标签齐全。无明显技术债务,但安全配置不足。建议引入现代前端框架和自动化测试,提升性能和安全性。
Analyze Another Website