Skip to main content

Is neoten.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - NEOTEN Reviews

neoten.lv favicon

Is neoten.lv Safe? Security Analysis for NEOTEN

Check if neoten.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyLatviasmall
Google reCAPTCHAGoogle Maps APIjQueryFont AwesomeKingComposer (kc-css-system classes)+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:04:57 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

NEOTEN is a Latvian company specializing in engine and turbocharger repair services for cogeneration units, with over 15 years of experience. The company operates a dedicated service station and emphasizes professionalism, confidentiality, and long-term partnerships. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and includes multiple contact methods and forms for customer engagement. Technically, the site uses WordPress with KingComposer and AjaxForm plugins, integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security, and Google Maps for location display. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and cookie consent banner present. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis. Overall, the site presents a credible and professional business presence with room for security and compliance improvements.

Detected Technologies

Google reCAPTCHAGoogle Maps APIjQueryFont AwesomeKingComposer (kc-css-system classes)AjaxForm component

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

NEOTEN operates in the energy sector, focusing on engine and turbocharger repairs for industrial cogeneration units. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting industrial clients requiring maintenance and repair services. The company has a stable market position with over 15 years of experience and a clear focus on quality and confidentiality. The website supports business growth through accessible contact forms and a product catalogue hosted on a related domain. The absence of social media presence suggests a focus on direct B2B relationships. The company appears small-sized, with localized operations in Latvia. The website content and contact details reinforce the company's legitimacy and professionalism.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

i*****@neoten.lv
i*****@neoten.eu

Phone Numbers (3)

+3716713****
+3716713****
+3712027****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA to secure user interactions and data submissions. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could be a compliance gap. The forms collect personal data including file uploads, so ensuring backend security and data protection is critical. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional headers, documented policies, and regular security audits.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

NEOTEN

Description:

NEOTEN specializes in repairing engines and turbochargers installed on cogeneration units, with over 15 years of experience. The company operates a service station for turbocharger repairs and emphasizes professionalism, confidentiality, and long-term cooperation with partners.

Key Services:
Engine repairTurbocharger repairService station operations
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google reCAPTCHAGoogle Maps APIjQueryFont AwesomeKingComposer (kc-css-system classes)AjaxForm component
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv mx ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 45 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:82.198.14.15
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
20: mx2.sigmanet.lv
10: mx.sigmanet.lv
SOA:Serial: 1753874224, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using KingComposer and AjaxForm plugins, integrating Google services such as reCAPTCHA, Maps API, and Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses modern CSS and JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate, with external dependencies on CDN-hosted resources. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but provides basic form validation and user feedback. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph properties but could be improved with structured data and richer metadata. The technical stack is standard for small to medium business websites, with opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website