Skip to main content

Is nesprit.vc a Scam? Security Check Results - Nesprit Reviews

nesprit.vc favicon

Is nesprit.vc Safe? Security Analysis for Nesprit

Check if nesprit.vc is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
Next.jsReactSuper.soMontserrat fontLeadsy AI tag
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 8:22:26 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Nesprit is a venture capital firm specializing in pre-seed and seed-stage investments focused on the Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) region. Their website serves as a basic informational landing page highlighting their investment focus and providing a to-do list for startups. The site is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, hosted likely on Vercel, and utilizes the Super.so platform which integrates Notion as a CMS. While the site is functional and mobile-optimized, it lacks comprehensive privacy, cookie, and security policies, and does not provide public contact information or incident response details. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but could be improved with additional headers and disclosures. Overall, the website presents a legitimate small VC firm but would benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactSuper.soMontserrat fontLeadsy AI tag

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Nesprit positions itself as a niche VC targeting early-stage startups in the CEE region, focusing on pre-seed and seed rounds. The business model revolves around venture investments and startup support. The website content is minimal but consistent with a small VC firm, lacking detailed business history or extensive team information. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated. The firm appears to be in early stages or maintains a lean digital presence. No direct partnerships or related domains were identified from the site content or WHOIS data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern web frameworks, which is positive. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR. No contact channels for security incidents are provided. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be significantly improved to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Nesprit

Description:

Nesprit is a pre-seed / seed-stage venture capital firm focused on Central and Eastern Europe (CEE).

Key Services:
pre-seed and seed-stage investmentsstartup support
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactSuper.soMontserrat fontLeadsy AI tag
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Platforms:
Super.so
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Leadsy AITrovo Tag
Marketing Tools:
Leadsy AI
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a simple, clean landing page for Nesprit VC

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:david@nesprit.vc
Forensic Reports:david@nesprit.vc

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 79 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.comDNS only
dns2.registrar-servers.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1726319242, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:72ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site uses a modern React/Next.js stack hosted on Vercel, leveraging Super.so for CMS integration with Notion. Fonts are loaded from trusted CDNs, and performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. The site is mobile-optimized and uses semantic HTML. However, SEO and accessibility features are basic, and no advanced analytics or tracking services are detected beyond minimal marketing tags. There is room for improvement in performance optimization and accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website