Skip to main content

Is nest.credit a Scam? Security Check Results - Nest Protocol Reviews

nest.credit favicon

Is nest.credit Safe? Security Analysis for Nest Protocol

Check if nest.credit is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/amedium
Framer (website builder)Cookiebot (cookie consent)SVG graphicsJavaScript
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:51:40 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Nest Protocol is a finance and technology company operating a DeFi platform that enables users to stake stablecoins into vaults which earn yield from real-world assets originated by regulated funds, brokers, and protocol asset issuers. The platform emphasizes partnerships with major institutional players such as BlackRock, Blackstone, Apollo, and others, positioning itself as a bridge between traditional finance and decentralized finance. The website is professionally designed using Framer, with good content quality and clear navigation. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a moderate to high level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent, though additional security headers and explicit security policies could enhance trust. Overall, the platform appears legitimate and trustworthy, though WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common in this sector. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected.

Detected Technologies

Framer (website builder)Cookiebot (cookie consent)SVG graphicsJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Nest Protocol targets investors interested in real-world asset-backed yield through DeFi. Its business model leverages stablecoin staking to generate yield from institutional-grade assets. The company demonstrates strong market positioning through partnerships with well-known financial institutions, enhancing credibility and trust. The platform's revenue likely derives from fees or yield sharing on staked assets. The partnership ecosystem is extensive, including asset originators and financial service providers, which supports growth and innovation. The absence of public contact information suggests a focus on institutional or crypto-savvy users. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a medium-sized enterprise profile in the finance and technology sectors.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and integrates a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting compliance with basic privacy standards. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no visible security or incident response policy. The lack of contact information for security incidents or a vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for a public-facing finance platform but with room for improvement in policy visibility and technical hardening.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Nest Protocol

Description:

Stake stablecoins on Nest to earn yield from assets bought by vaults from regulated funds, brokers, and issuing protocols, featuring BlackRock, Blackstone, Apollo, and more.

Key Services:
Stablecoin stakingYield generation from real-world assetsVault management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Framer (website builder)Cookiebot (cookie consent)SVG graphicsJavaScript
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Framer events
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
CookiebotFramer events
Marketing Tools:
Cookiebot
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:31.43.160.6, 31.43.161.6
Name Servers:
julissa.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
maciej.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: eforward1.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward2.registrar-servers.com
10: eforward3.registrar-servers.com
15: eforward4.registrar-servers.com
20: eforward5.registrar-servers.com
SOA:Serial: 2382482390, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:68ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design platform, and includes JavaScript for interactivity and cookie consent via Cookiebot. The site uses SVG graphics extensively for logos and branding, ensuring scalability and visual quality. Performance is moderate with responsive design for mobile devices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting details are not explicit but likely involve Identity Digital or associated CDN providers. No CMS other than Framer is detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from additional security and accessibility enhancements.
Analyze Another Website