Skip to main content

Is newtribe.capital a Scam? Security Check Results - NewTribe Capital Reviews

N

Is newtribe.capital Safe? Security Analysis for NewTribe Capital

Check if newtribe.capital is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
Nuxt.jsVue.jsSwiper.jsGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Microsoft Clarity
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:44:08 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

NewTribe Capital is a specialized venture capital firm focusing on early-stage Web3 blockchain investments across Asia, Europe, and the MENA region. The company positions itself as a niche player in the blockchain investment space, offering portfolio management and advisory services related to tokenomics and macroeconomics. The website content is professional but basic, lacking detailed business information such as founding year or physical location. The target audience primarily includes blockchain startups and investors interested in emerging markets within the Web3 ecosystem. Technically, the website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, with integration of analytics tools like Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity. The site appears moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, though accessibility features are basic. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the provided data. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (implied by external script loading over HTTPS), but no security headers were detected in the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information, reduces the site's compliance posture and trustworthiness. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for financial firms but limits transparency. No forms or user data collection fields were found, minimizing immediate data exposure risks. Overall, the website presents a professional but minimal digital presence with moderate technical maturity. Security and privacy compliance require improvement, particularly by adding policies, contact details, and security headers. The domain's privacy-protected WHOIS is justified but should be balanced with transparency to enhance trust. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security posture, publishing compliance policies, and improving contact accessibility to strengthen business credibility and user trust.

Detected Technologies

Nuxt.jsVue.jsSwiper.jsGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Microsoft Clarity

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

NewTribe Capital operates in the finance sector as a venture capital firm specializing in Web3 blockchain investments. Its market positioning is niche, targeting early-stage projects in Asia, Europe, and MENA. The business model revolves around investing in and advising blockchain startups, leveraging expertise in tokenomics and macroeconomics. Revenue streams likely include equity stakes and advisory fees. The company appears small in size with no public parent or subsidiary affiliations. The website lacks detailed business disclosures, which limits insight into growth indicators or partnerships. However, the use of modern web technologies and analytics suggests a focus on digital engagement. The absence of contact information and compliance policies may hinder investor confidence and partnership development.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture of the website is basic. HTTPS is used, but no security headers were detected, which exposes the site to potential risks such as clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and cross-site scripting. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The absence of contact details further reduces the ability for users to report security issues. While no explicit vulnerabilities were identified in the provided data, the site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices, including security headers, clear privacy policies, and incident response contacts to improve resilience and trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

NewTribe Capital

Description:

NewTribe Capital specializes in early-stage Web3 blockchain investments in Asia, Europe, and MENA.

Key Services:
Early-stage Web3 blockchain investmentsPortfolio managementTokenomics and macroeconomics advisory
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Nuxt.jsVue.jsSwiper.jsGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks:
Nuxt.jsVue.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsMicrosoft Clarity
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing Tools:
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:35.157.26.135, 63.176.8.218
Name Servers:
dns1.p05.nsone.netDNS only
dns2.p05.nsone.netDNS only
dns3.p05.nsone.netDNS only
dns4.p05.nsone.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1736492590, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:97ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack using Nuxt.js and Vue.js frameworks, which supports modular and performant web applications. Integration with Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity indicates a focus on user behavior analysis and optimization. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets with modulepreload and prefetch hints, suggesting performance optimization efforts. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is good based on meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Overall, the infrastructure is modern but requires enhancements in security and compliance to reduce technical debt and operational risks.
Analyze Another Website