Skip to main content

Is nextbike.at a Scam? Security Check Results - nextbike business Reviews

nextbike.at favicon

Is nextbike.at Safe? Security Analysis for nextbike business

Check if nextbike.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationGermanylarge
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQuerySelect2Font Awesome+3 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 8:33:09 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Nextbike business operates as a leading European bike-sharing service provider, offering tailored mobility solutions including both station-based and stationless bike-sharing systems. The company positions itself as a market leader in Europe, supported by a professional website with multilingual capabilities and strong branding aligned with its parent company, TIER Mobility. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure built on WordPress with SEO optimization and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. The absence of WHOIS domain registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and social media presence support business credibility. Privacy and cookie policies are not clearly presented, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site is professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQuerySelect2Font AwesomeGoogle FontsOpen Sans fontFlickity carousel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Nextbike's market position as a European bike-sharing leader is reinforced by its comprehensive service offerings and integration with TIER Mobility. The business model focuses on providing flexible bike-sharing solutions to urban mobility markets. The website targets both end-users and business clients, emphasizing tailored mobility systems. The company leverages social media channels for brand engagement and maintains a consistent digital presence. However, the lack of explicit contact details and privacy documentation on the website may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The domain registration inconsistency suggests a need for verification of digital assets to ensure brand protection and legitimacy.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

k*****@nextbike.de

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency for security researchers and users. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. While no immediate vulnerabilities are evident, the security posture would benefit from formalized policies, enhanced header configurations, and public disclosure mechanisms to improve trust and resilience.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

nextbike business

Description:

Passgenaue Mobilitätslösungen im Bike-Sharing mit nextbike. Stationsbasiert oder stationslos: Wir stellen maßgeschneiderte Systeme bereit.

Key Services:
Bike-sharing systemsMobility solutionsStation-based and stationless bike-sharing
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQuerySelect2Font AwesomeGoogle FontsOpen Sans fontFlickity carousel
Frameworks:
WordPress CMS
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=16000000"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "origin-when-cross-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.nextbike.net include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.pluspol-networks.de include:mail.zendesk.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:c46e9357@inbox.ondmarc.com
Forensic Reports:c46e9357@inbox.ondmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 57 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 25 days

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
high(8 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:46.163.83.220
Name Servers:
anna.ns.cloudflare.com
pete.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: mail2.nextbike.net
20: mail.nextbike.net
SOA:Serial: 2378835262, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:61ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.nextbike.net include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.pluspol-networks.de include:mail.zendesk.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Select2 for enhanced UI elements. It uses standard web fonts and icon libraries like Font Awesome. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes multilingual support. Performance appears moderate with no evident blocking scripts or heavy resources. Accessibility features are basic but could be improved. The technical stack is current but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and formalized compliance features to reduce technical debt and regulatory risks.
Analyze Another Website