Is nic.versicherung Safe? Security Analysis for tldbox GmbH
Check if nic.versicherung is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website www.nic.versicherung serves as the official registry and domain registration portal for the .versicherung top-level domain, targeting the German-speaking insurance industry. Operated by tldbox GmbH, an Austrian company, it offers domain registration services, premium domain sales, and comprehensive information about the .versicherung TLD. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation and content relevant to its niche audience. Technically, it employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap and Matomo analytics, with a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR standards. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, though some security headers are missing. WHOIS data is unavailable due to registry restrictions, which impacts transparency but the website's contact information and business presentation support legitimacy.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The business operates as a specialized domain registry focusing on the insurance sector, providing a niche TLD that acts as a trust and branding signal for insurance companies. Its market position is niche but authoritative within the German-speaking insurance domain space. The business model revolves around domain registration fees and premium domain sales. The company maintains partnerships with related domain and DNS service providers, enhancing its ecosystem. The presence of a newsletter and detailed policy pages indicates an engaged and compliant operation. Growth potential is tied to the insurance industry's digital presence expansion.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (1)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security hardening. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of Matomo analytics and third-party tracking scripts is transparent and consent-based. Incident response contact is provided via an abuse page and company email. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a minor concern but likely due to registry policy rather than malicious intent.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
tldbox GmbH
Registry and service provider for the .versicherung top-level domain, targeting the German-speaking insurance industry. Provides domain registration services, premium domains, and related information.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent with opt-out and opt-in options
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 59 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings