Skip to main content

Is niva-duhovnaja.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Общество Милосердия и Духовного Просвещения "Нива Духовная" Reviews

О

Is niva-duhovnaja.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Общество Милосердия и Духовного Просвещения "Нива Духовная"

Check if niva-duhovnaja.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitLatviasmall
jQuery 1.4.3jQuery Fancybox 1.3.4Facebook SDKGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:48:05 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website represents a small non-profit organization named "Общество Милосердия и Духовного Просвещения 'Нива Духовная'" based in Latvia, focused on spiritual education and charitable assistance to vulnerable groups. Founded in 1992, it provides religious articles, events, and community support primarily in Russian. The technical infrastructure relies on older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.4.3 and Fancybox 1.3.4, with integration of Facebook SDK and Google Analytics for social and analytics purposes. The site lacks modern CMS indications and shows basic design and navigation features with limited mobile optimization.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.4.3jQuery Fancybox 1.3.4Facebook SDKGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization operates in the non-profit sector with a focus on religious and charitable activities. Its market position is small and community-centric, targeting Russian-speaking audiences interested in Orthodox Christian teachings and social support. The business model is donation and volunteer-based without commercial revenue streams. The website content is primarily informational with no e-commerce or transactional features. Partnerships appear limited but include links to related Orthodox Christian sites. Growth indicators are modest with regular article updates but no advanced digital marketing or monetization strategies.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

n*****@gmail.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is basic with several concerns. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries exposes the site to known vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement on all internal links, and no security headers such as CSP or X-Frame-Options are present. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating poor compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Tracking technologies like Google Analytics and Facebook SDK are used without visible consent mechanisms. Incident response and security policies are not disclosed, limiting readiness assessment. Overall, the site requires modernization and improved security controls to reduce risk.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Update all JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Общество Милосердия и Духовного Просвещения "Нива Духовная"

Description:

Общество милосердия и духовного просвещения «Нива Духовная» во имя преподобного Сергия Радонежского, образованное в 1992 году, оказывает духовную и материальную помощь нуждающимся, обучает заповедям Божиим и способствует духовной жизни по Евангельскому учению.

Key Services:
spiritual educationmaterial assistance to poor, orphans, elderly, prisoners, homelesspublishing articles and journals
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.4.3jQuery Fancybox 1.3.4Facebook SDKGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS scripts for analytics and Facebook SDK

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel (implied via Facebook SDK)
Marketing Tools:
Facebook SDK
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

32/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 1 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

77 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:77.93.28.217
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1740567944, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:114ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy JavaScript libraries and lacks modern CMS or frameworks, indicating technical debt. Performance is moderate but mobile optimization is poor, limiting accessibility. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available. The site integrates third-party analytics and social media SDKs but without visible privacy controls. There is opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve responsiveness, and enhance security configurations to support better user experience and compliance.
Analyze Another Website