Skip to main content

Is nlcsa.com a Scam? Security Check Results - nlcsa.com Reviews

N

Is nlcsa.com Safe? Security Analysis for 403 - Forbidden

https://nlcsa.com

Check if nlcsa.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 4:18:28 AM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at nlcsa.com is currently inaccessible to the public, returning a 403 Forbidden error page. This indicates that access is blocked or restricted, preventing any meaningful content or business information from being displayed. The domain is long-established, created in 1999, and registered with Tucows Domains Inc. using Hover name servers, but no registrant details or contact information are publicly available. The lack of accessible content, privacy policies, contact details, or security information severely limits the ability to assess the business or its digital maturity. Technically, the site does not show evidence of modern frameworks, analytics, or security headers, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap. Overall, the site’s security posture is minimal, and the business credibility is low due to the absence of public information.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the website being blocked with a 403 error, no business intelligence data such as company name, services, market position, or target audience can be extracted. The domain age suggests a potentially long-standing entity, but the lack of accessible content or contact information prevents any insights into business operations, revenue streams, or partnerships. There are no indications of certifications, compliance, or trust signals. The domain registration is consistent and uses reputable registrar services, but the absence of public-facing information limits confidence in business credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is weak based on available data. The domain has transfer and update locks enabled, which is positive for domain hijacking protection. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers or SSL/TLS configuration details are observable from the content. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The 403 Forbidden error page suggests restricted access, which may be intentional for security or administrative reasons but also limits transparency. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal user tracking but also minimal security monitoring. Overall, the security maturity is low with significant room for improvement.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is blocked or forbidden. No WAF vendor branding detected but content is inaccessible.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
20/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is a 403 Forbidden error page with no accessible business or contact information.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:35.212.122.179 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.getresponse.com include:outbound.mailhop.org -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:35.212.31.103
Name Servers:
ns1.hover.comDNS only
ns2.hover.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: nlcsa-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1746811879, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:199ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:35.212.122.179 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.getresponse.com include:outbound.mailhop.org -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

CRITICAL

Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves a 403 Forbidden error page with minimal HTML content and no interactive elements or forms. The only external resources loaded are Google Fonts and domain name servers from Hover. No CMS, frameworks, or analytics tools are detected. The domain is hosted under Tucows Domains Inc. with Hover name servers. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and no SSL/TLS details are available from the content. Performance and mobile optimization are poor due to lack of content and responsive design. The technical infrastructure appears minimal or inactive, suggesting the site may be under maintenance, restricted, or abandoned.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about nlcsa.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website