Skip to main content

Is nlla.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - National Maritime Pilots Association of Latvia Reviews

nlla.lv favicon

Is nlla.lv Safe? Security Analysis for National Maritime Pilots Association of Latvia

Check if nlla.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
jQueryGoogle AnalyticsCoin Slider pluginColorbox pluginGoogle Maps API
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:04:12 PM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The National Maritime Pilots Association of Latvia operates as a non-governmental organization representing Latvian marine pilots. Founded in 2003, it focuses on protecting pilots' rights, promoting professional knowledge, and representing their interests nationally and internationally. The website serves as an informational platform targeting maritime professionals and stakeholders in Latvia's shipping and port industry. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, utilizing common JavaScript libraries and plugins such as jQuery, Coin Slider, and Google Maps API. It employs HTTPS and Google Analytics for visitor tracking but lacks advanced security headers and privacy disclosures. The security posture is basic, with room for improvement in headers and compliance documentation. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy policies and security practices to align with modern standards.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGoogle AnalyticsCoin Slider pluginColorbox pluginGoogle Maps API

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The association holds a niche position within the maritime transportation sector in Latvia, serving as a key representative body for marine pilots. Its business model is non-profit and advocacy-focused, relying on membership and industry collaboration. The website's external links indicate strong connections with maritime weather services, vessel tracking platforms, and international pilot associations, suggesting a well-established partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators are limited but the organization's longevity since 2003 implies stability. The absence of detailed contact information and privacy policies may limit engagement and trust from broader audiences.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a foundational security setup with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory. However, the absence of critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces its defense against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and YouTube embeds introduces potential privacy concerns without explicit user consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is basic and would benefit from implementing standard web security best practices and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

National Maritime Pilots Association of Latvia

Description:

Latvian National Pilots Association - a non-governmental organization that unites Latvian port Marine pilots. Founded in 2003. The association's objective is to provide Marine pilots rights and protection, represent their interests nationally and internationally, and promote professional Marine pilot knowledge.

Key Services:
Representation of marine pilots' rights and interestsPromotion of professional knowledge and educationAdvocacy in national and international maritime organizations
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGoogle AnalyticsCoin Slider pluginColorbox pluginGoogle Maps API
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 46 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

68 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

Insufficient Name Servers

MEDIUM

Domain has only 1 name server (minimum 2 recommended)

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:80.232.225.83
Name Servers:
ns.public.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.nlla.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025021703, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:106ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with standard plugins for sliders and galleries, leveraging jQuery and Google Maps API for interactive features. The site loads moderately fast but lacks advanced performance optimizations. Mobile optimization is basic, with some responsiveness but no advanced accessibility features detected. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags found. The use of Google Analytics indicates visitor tracking but without visible privacy controls. The technical stack is stable but could be modernized with updated frameworks and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website