Skip to main content

Is nobid.io a Scam? Security Check Results - NoBid Reviews

nobid.io favicon

Is nobid.io Safe? Security Analysis for NoBid

Check if nobid.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
WordPressjQuerySlider RevolutionCleanTalk Anti-SpamAmazon Polly+3 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 3:34:52 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

NoBid is a specialized programmatic advertising technology platform focused on optimizing the bottom of the ad stack to increase revenue for publishers. The company offers advanced display advertising and OTT/CTV solutions, leveraging proprietary pricing algorithms and a no-risk integration model. The website presents a professional and modern digital presence built on WordPress, utilizing various plugins and technologies to enhance user experience and functionality. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and anti-spam measures, though explicit privacy and security policies are not publicly available. Overall, the site reflects a credible business with a clear market position in the programmatic advertising industry.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQuerySlider RevolutionCleanTalk Anti-SpamAmazon PollyResponsive Vector MapsFont AwesomeBootstrap

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

NoBid targets publishers and media companies seeking to maximize ad revenue through innovative programmatic technology. Their competitive advantage lies in focusing on unfilled and undervalued inventory, providing solutions that complement existing demand stacks. The business model is B2B with a no-risk approach, supported by proprietary algorithms and dedicated account management. Partnerships with companies like GreenWrap and MediaFuse indicate a collaborative ecosystem. Testimonials from clients reinforce the effectiveness and flexibility of their offerings. The company operates in the technology and media sectors, likely at a medium organizational size.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and uses anti-spam plugins to protect forms. However, it lacks visible security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, and no security.txt file is found. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent banner present but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service documents. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers limits transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room for improvement in policy publication and header implementation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

NoBid

Description:

NoBid is a programmatic technology platform focusing on optimizing the bottom of the ad stack to increase yield, fill rates, CPMs, and revenue for publishers. It offers display advertising and OTT/CTV solutions with proprietary pricing algorithms and a no-risk model.

Key Services:
Display Advertising SolutionsOTT/CTV SolutionsProprietary Pricing AlgorithmsRevenue Optimization
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQuerySlider RevolutionCleanTalk Anti-SpamAmazon PollyResponsive Vector MapsFont AwesomeBootstrap
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Anti-spam plugin (CleanTalk)
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
CleanTalk pixel
Marketing Tools:
CleanTalk Anti-Spam
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based programmatic advertising platform site

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

95/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 504-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(504-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

7 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(208 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:52.70.110.208, 52.20.244.61, 54.158.133.6
Name Servers:
ns-1001.awsdns-61.net
ns-1419.awsdns-49.org
ns-1747.awsdns-26.co.uk
ns-390.awsdns-48.com
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:82ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging popular plugins such as Slider Revolution, CleanTalk Anti-Spam, Amazon Polly, and Responsive Vector Maps. The tech stack includes jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend functionality. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses modern web standards but lacks some accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not discernible. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and professional design, though some technical debt is indicated by missing security headers and incomplete policy documentation.
Analyze Another Website