Skip to main content

Is noble.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - Noble Reviews

noble.xyz favicon

Is noble.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Noble

Check if noble.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsLottie-web
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:50:49 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Noble is a technology company focused on innovating digital asset issuance, particularly stablecoins and real world assets on blockchain platforms using the IBC protocol. The website presents a modern, well-designed interface built on the Framer platform, leveraging JavaScript libraries such as Lottie-web and Google Analytics for enhanced user experience and tracking. However, the site lacks critical privacy and security policy disclosures, contact information, and security headers, which are important for trust and compliance in the fintech and blockchain sectors. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid technical foundation but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsLottie-web

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Noble positions itself as an innovator in blockchain-based stablecoin and asset issuance, targeting developers and fintech companies seeking secure and efficient cross-chain asset solutions. The business model revolves around providing a minimalistic, high-security architecture combined with the IBC protocol for interoperability. The company appears to be a small technology startup with no visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The lack of published contact details and policies suggests an early-stage or stealth approach to public engagement. The use of modern web technologies and analytics indicates digital maturity, but the absence of privacy and security disclosures may impact user trust and regulatory compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency in security management. The use of Google Analytics without visible consent mechanisms raises privacy concerns under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The overall security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhanced security policies, headers, and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Noble

Description:

Noble is changing how stablecoins and other real world assets are issued on blockchains by combining minimalistic, high security architecture with the cross-chain efficiencies of the IBC protocol.

Key Services:
Stablecoin issuanceReal world asset tokenizationCross-chain asset transfer via IBC protocol
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsLottie-web
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses Framer CMS with modern JavaScript libraries.

πŸ›‘οΈSecurity Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

πŸ‘€GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

πŸ›‘οΈNIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

πŸ“§Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

πŸ†SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

πŸ“ŠDNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:35.71.142.77, 52.223.52.2
Name Servers:
andronicus.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
lilyana.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382483303, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:114ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

⚑Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

πŸ”§Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Framer CMS platform with modern JavaScript libraries such as Lottie-web for animations and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by external scripts and hosting infrastructure. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and suitable for a technology startup, though there is room for improvement in security configurations and privacy compliance to reduce technical debt and regulatory risk.
Analyze Another Website