Skip to main content

Is node.capital a Scam? Security Check Results - Node Capital Reviews

node.capital favicon

Is node.capital Safe? Security Analysis for Node Capital

Check if node.capital is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Space Mono)Three.js (3D graphics)p5.js (canvas graphics)GSAP (animation)+1 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:52:29 PM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Node Capital is a specialized cryptocurrency venture fund focused on early-stage investments in crypto infrastructure and decentralized protocols. The company emphasizes a thesis-driven approach and provides hands-on technical and tokenomics support to its portfolio projects. It operates subsidiaries such as Node.Monster for network bootstrapping and node.security for blockchain security audits, reinforcing its active role in the ecosystem. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with clear business and team information, supporting its market position as a niche crypto investor. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, Three.js for 3D graphics, p5.js for canvas animations, and GSAP for smooth animations. It is hosted likely on Webflow's platform, with good performance and mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility are basic but adequate. Analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager, indicating moderate user tracking. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks explicit security headers and published security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, representing a compliance gap. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, which is common in the crypto sector and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, Node Capital's website is trustworthy and professional, with strong business credibility and technical implementation. Improvements in privacy compliance and security policy transparency would enhance its security posture and regulatory alignment.

Detected Technologies

Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Space Mono)Three.js (3D graphics)p5.js (canvas graphics)GSAP (animation)Google Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Node Capital operates in the competitive crypto venture capital space, focusing on seed and A-stage investments in blockchain infrastructure and decentralized protocols. Its competitive advantage lies in its technical expertise and active operational support, including node operation and security auditing subsidiaries. The business model combines financial investment with hands-on technical and governance assistance, differentiating it from purely financial investors. The portfolio includes a diverse set of crypto projects, indicating a broad network and influence. The company targets crypto entrepreneurs, investors, and developers, positioning itself as a trusted partner in the crypto ecosystem. Growth indicators include active blog content and a growing portfolio. Partnerships with subsidiaries like Node.Monster and node.security strengthen its ecosystem presence. The company appears to be small but specialized, with a focus on quality and technical depth rather than scale.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@node.capital

Company Registration

Registration Number:

company Node

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which are recommended best practices. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the company to regulatory risks, especially under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a marketing website but could be improved by implementing security headers, publishing policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Node Capital

Description:

Node Capital is a thesis-driven cryptocurrency fund focused on long-term investments in seed or A-stage crypto infrastructure and decentralized protocols. They actively contribute to emerging protocols and networks, providing technical and tokenomics support, and operate Node.Monster to assist network bootstrapping.

Key Services:
Investment in crypto infrastructure and decentralized protocolsTechnical and tokenomics advisoryNetwork bootstrapping via Node.MonsterSecurity auditing via node.security
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Space Mono)Three.js (3D graphics)p5.js (canvas graphics)GSAP (animation)Google Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Webflow
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and content-rich.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 35 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: 5tkz77knabfgdd5udbgddxi74vgvmi2r42tms3yaw7ejb262ugjq.mx-verification.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.70.75, 99.83.190.102
Name Servers:
ns13.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns14.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
15: 5tkz77knabfgdd5udbgddxi74vgvmi2r42tms3yaw7ejb262ugjq.mx-verification.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025031100, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:89ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Three.js for interactive 3D graphics and p5.js for canvas-based animations, indicating a high level of front-end sophistication. GSAP is used for smooth animations enhancing user experience. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is responsive and performs well on mobile devices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data, though structured data like JSON-LD is absent. Hosting appears to be Webflow's managed platform, providing reliable uptime and performance. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. The technical implementation is modern and well-executed, supporting a professional digital presence.
Analyze Another Website