Skip to main content

Is node.monster a Scam? Security Check Results - Node.Monster Reviews

node.monster favicon

Is node.monster Safe? Security Analysis for Node.Monster

Check if node.monster is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Epilogue, Familjen Grotesk)Tippy.js (tooltip library)Cloudflare Turnstile (captcha)Rive (embedded animation iframe)
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:49:21 PM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Node.Monster is a reputable blockchain infrastructure provider specializing in secure and scalable node operations, validator services, and staking support across multiple blockchain networks. With over a decade of experience and significant assets under management, the company positions itself as a trusted partner in the crypto ecosystem, supporting decentralization and community growth through initiatives like Quick Grants. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence built on Webflow, integrating advanced web technologies and security measures such as Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for form protection. However, the absence of explicit privacy, cookie, and security policies indicates areas for compliance improvement. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and secure form handling, but could benefit from enhanced security headers and published incident response contacts. Overall, Node.Monster demonstrates a mature business and technical infrastructure with high trustworthiness and a clear focus on blockchain node services.

Detected Technologies

Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Epilogue, Familjen Grotesk)Tippy.js (tooltip library)Cloudflare Turnstile (captcha)Rive (embedded animation iframe)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Node.Monster operates in the blockchain technology sector, targeting blockchain projects, validators, and staking participants. Their business model revolves around providing node operation services, liquid staking support, white label solutions, and advisory. The company leverages partnerships with notable blockchain projects and staking platforms, enhancing its market position. The presence of testimonials from industry leaders and a group company relationship with Node.Capital further strengthen its credibility. The company appears medium-sized with a global operational footprint, emphasizing uptime and security through institutional-grade data centers and cloud providers. The business shows growth potential through ecosystem participation and community engagement via Quick Grants.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses Cloudflare Turnstile captcha to secure its contact form, indicating good security hygiene. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden security further. No published security policies or incident response contacts were found, which could impact transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced with additional policies and headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Node.Monster

Description:

Node.Monster is a team of blockchain pioneers and experts specializing in reliable, scalable, and secure node operations for blockchain ecosystems. They support decentralization and innovation across crypto networks and dedicate a portion of validator rewards to community Quick Grants.

Key Services:
Node ServicesLiquid Re/Staking SupportWhite Label ServicesAdvisory
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Epilogue, Familjen Grotesk)Tippy.js (tooltip library)Cloudflare Turnstile (captcha)Rive (embedded animation iframe)
Frameworks:
Webflow
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and content-rich.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: LinkedIn, Cloudflare, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

14/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.node.monster ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 79 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(639 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.70.75, 99.83.190.102
Name Servers:
ns05.domaincontrol.com
ns06.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090400, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:75ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.node.monster ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web fonts and JavaScript libraries such as Tippy.js for tooltips and Rive for animations. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, ensuring good performance and availability. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and clear navigation. The use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha enhances form security. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times and resource management. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and stable, supporting the business goals effectively.
Analyze Another Website