Skip to main content

Is nolimits.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - NoLimits! Reviews

N

Is nolimits.lv Safe? Security Analysis for NoLimits!

Check if nolimits.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
WordPress 6.5.5Elementor 3.22.1jQuery 3.7.1Swiper 8.4.5
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:03:29 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

NoLimits! is a small-scale development and multimedia service provider, as indicated by the website title and content. The company appears to focus on digital development and multimedia solutions, targeting a general audience. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The technical infrastructure is standard for small businesses, with no advanced hosting or third-party integrations detected. Security posture is basic; HTTPS is enabled, but no security headers or privacy policies are present, which could expose the business to compliance risks. The absence of contact information and WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional and professionally branded but lacks comprehensive compliance and security features.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.5.5Elementor 3.22.1jQuery 3.7.1Swiper 8.4.5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself in the development and multimedia sector, likely serving local or niche clients given the small size and limited online presence. The business model appears service-oriented without evident e-commerce or subscription components. The lack of detailed business information, certifications, or trust signals suggests a small or emerging business. The presence of related subdomains indicates some diversification or segmentation of services. No partnerships or external business relationships are explicitly stated. Growth indicators and strategic positioning are unclear due to limited public data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No forms or input fields were detected that require special security considerations. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which may hinder effective security incident management. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small business but requiring improvements to meet best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

NoLimits!

Description:

No Limits! Development and Multimedia

Key Services:
DevelopmentMultimedia
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.5.5Elementor 3.22.1jQuery 3.7.1Swiper 8.4.5
Frameworks:
WordPressElementor
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is built on WordPress with Elementor page builder.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 67 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:92.240.74.195
Name Servers:
archer.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
nucum.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
30: mx3.latnet.lv
10: mx.latnet.lv
20: mx2.latnet.lv
SOA:Serial: 2378149226, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:126ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern CMS (WordPress) with a popular page builder (Elementor), ensuring ease of content management and design flexibility. The inclusion of jQuery and Swiper libraries supports interactive and responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with no evident optimization issues but also no advanced performance enhancements. The site is mobile-optimized with basic accessibility features. The lack of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection, which aligns with privacy-conscious practices but limits marketing insights. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and compliance documentation indicates areas for modernization.
Analyze Another Website