Skip to main content

Is nomic.foundation a Scam? Security Check Results - Nomic Foundation Reviews

nomic.foundation favicon

Is nomic.foundation Safe? Security Analysis for Nomic Foundation

Check if nomic.foundation is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyCanadasmall
Next.jsReactCloudflare DNSGoogle Analytics (partial)
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:17:55 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Nomic Foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to advancing the Ethereum ecosystem by providing open-source engineering software and empowering developers. Their market position is that of a public goods organization focused on supporting Ethereum developers and ensuring the platform's long-term success. The website is professionally designed using modern technologies such as Next.js and React, hosted via Cloudflare, and includes integrations like Google Analytics for user insights. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections enabled, though DNSSEC is not enabled and privacy policies are absent. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves its target audience effectively but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and explicit contact information.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactCloudflare DNSGoogle Analytics (partial)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Nomic Foundation operates as a small-sized non-profit in the technology sector, specifically targeting Ethereum developers and blockchain technology communities. Their business model revolves around open-source software development and ecosystem support rather than commercial revenue generation. The foundation maintains a professional online presence with active social media channels on Twitter, LinkedIn, and GitHub, indicating engagement with the developer community. The domain age and registration details align with a legitimate new organization. There are no indications of suspicious activities or misleading information.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with domain status flags that prevent unauthorized transfers and updates, indicating good domain management practices. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, and no incident response contacts are provided. Google Analytics is used for tracking, but privacy compliance measures such as cookie consent banners or privacy policies are missing. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in transparency and DNS security.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Nomic Foundation

Description:

A non-profit advancing the Ethereum ecosystem providing open-source engineering software to empower developers and ensure Ethereum's continued success.

Key Services:
Open-source engineering softwareDeveloper empowermentEthereum ecosystem support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactCloudflare DNSGoogle Analytics (partial)
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain transfer and update protection enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and focused on Ethereum developer community.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 47 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(36 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
dawn.ns.cloudflare.com
ed.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2378214038, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:66ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js stack, hosted on Cloudflare infrastructure, which provides good performance and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized and has a clear navigation structure. However, SEO and accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. Google Analytics is implemented but without clear privacy disclosures. The site does not use a CMS, indicating a custom or static site approach. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved compliance and security best practices.
Analyze Another Website