Skip to main content

Is noteforms.com a Scam? Security Check Results - noteforms.com Reviews

noteforms.com favicon

Is noteforms.com Safe? Security Analysis for Create beautiful forms to fill your Notion databases - NoteForms

Check if noteforms.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Nuxt.jsTailwind CSSInter fontAWS DNS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 4:59:02 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

NoteForms is a recently established SaaS company founded in 2023 that offers a specialized service enabling users to create beautiful forms integrated with Notion databases. The website is professionally designed using modern web technologies such as Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and targets productivity enthusiasts and Notion users. The technical infrastructure is modern and moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, indicating room for improvement. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no contact or incident response information is provided, which may affect user trust and regulatory compliance. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires enhancements in privacy, security, and transparency to improve trustworthiness and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Nuxt.jsTailwind CSSInter fontAWS DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on productivity tools for Notion users. Its SaaS model likely generates revenue through subscriptions or usage fees. The company appears to be a small startup with no public parent or subsidiary companies. The market positioning is niche, targeting a specific user base of Notion users seeking enhanced form capabilities. The lack of visible trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials suggests an early-stage business. No partnerships or related domains were identified. Growth potential depends on expanding user base and improving compliance and security to build trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data was found in the provided content. The lack of a security policy or incident response contact channels indicates limited preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

NoteForms provides a service to create beautiful forms that integrate with Notion databases.

Key Services:
Form creationIntegration with Notion databases
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Nuxt.jsTailwind CSSInter fontAWS DNS
Frameworks:
Nuxt.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a SaaS tool for Notion users to create forms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(315 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.164.206.58, 3.164.206.100, 3.164.206.106, 3.164.206.80
Name Servers:
ns-1460.awsdns-54.org
ns-201.awsdns-25.com
ns-2040.awsdns-63.co.uk
ns-932.awsdns-52.net
MX Records:
10: inbound-smtp.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:78ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework (Nuxt.js) with Tailwind CSS for styling, indicating a contemporary frontend architecture. Hosting is managed via AWS DNS services, suggesting reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal, which could be improved for better user reach and compliance. No CMS or third-party analytics/tracking tools were detected, indicating a lean technical stack. The site lacks advanced security configurations such as DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for modern web applications.
Analyze Another Website