Skip to main content

Is novarem.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - novarem.lv Reviews

novarem.lv favicon

Is novarem.lv Safe? Security Analysis for novarem.lv

Check if novarem.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScript
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:06:39 AM
35
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website novarem.lv currently presents a minimal maintenance or placeholder page with no substantive content, metadata, or business information. The site is built on WordPress, indicated by the asset paths, but lacks any visible contact details, privacy policies, or security features. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits prevents verification of domain registration details, further limiting trust and legitimacy assessments. Technically, the site uses basic JavaScript and CSS but does not demonstrate modern SEO or accessibility practices. Security posture is weak with no evidence of HTTPS or security headers. Overall, the site appears inactive or under construction, offering no clear business value or user engagement.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of content and business information, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. There is no indication of market positioning, target audience, or service offerings. The domain may be reserved or temporarily offline. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable. The absence of contact or legal information suggests the site is not currently operational as a business platform.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is poor given the lack of HTTPS confirmation, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The site does not demonstrate compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. The minimal content and lack of forms reduce attack surface but also indicate a lack of security maturity. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and mostly a placeholder or maintenance page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web10.garmtech.net a:ns2.garmtech.com include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.194.77.200
Name Servers:
ns1.garmtech.comDNS only
ns2.garmtech.comDNS only
ns3.garmtech.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.novarem.lv
20: mx2.garmtech.com
SOA:Serial: 2025031104, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:137ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web10.garmtech.net a:ns2.garmtech.com include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress but currently serves a minimal maintenance page with limited assets. The tech stack includes basic JavaScript and CSS files. There is no evidence of modern SEO tags, structured data, or analytics integration. Performance and mobile optimization appear basic. The lack of HTTPS and security headers represents a technical risk. The site requires modernization and content development to improve user experience and operational readiness.
Analyze Another Website