Skip to main content

Is nsf.gov a Scam? Security Check Results - National Science Foundation Reviews

nsf.gov favicon

Is nsf.gov Safe? Security Analysis for National Science Foundation

Check if nsf.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Statesenterprise
Drupal 10Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCrazy EggAddToAny+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 11:10:49 AM
73
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is a U.S. federal government agency dedicated to supporting science and engineering research and education nationwide. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for funding opportunities, award management, news, and educational resources targeting researchers, educators, students, and industry stakeholders. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation, mobile optimization, and accessibility compliance, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10 and leverages modern analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Crazy Egg, and the Digital Analytics Program. It employs the U.S. Web Design System for consistent government branding and user experience. The site is served over HTTPS with strong SSL configuration, though explicit security headers are not fully confirmed in the provided data. From a security perspective, NSF demonstrates good practices including a published vulnerability disclosure policy and privacy policy, though cookie consent mechanisms could be improved for GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for government domains, and the .gov TLD strongly supports legitimacy. Overall, the website is a trustworthy, authoritative source for science funding information with a strong security posture and professional digital infrastructure. Strategic recommendations include enhancing visible security headers, implementing cookie consent, and publishing incident response contacts more explicitly.

Detected Technologies

Drupal 10Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCrazy EggAddToAnyjs-cookie

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

NSF holds a leading position as the primary U.S. government agency funding scientific research and education. Its business model is non-commercial, focused on grant funding and public service. The website targets a broad audience including researchers, educators, students, industry, and policymakers. The agency's extensive network and funding programs position it as a critical enabler of scientific advancement. The digital presence supports transparency, outreach, and engagement with stakeholders. Partnerships with other government and research entities are implied through linked domains and resources. Growth indicators include recent initiatives in AI and quantum research funding. The NSF's operations are consistent with a large, enterprise-level government organization with a focus on innovation, STEM workforce development, and technology acceleration. The website content and structure reflect these priorities clearly.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

703*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The NSF website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a published vulnerability disclosure policy. The presence of privacy and research security policies indicates compliance with federal standards. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options were not confirmed and should be verified. The absence of a security.txt file or explicit incident response contact is a minor gap. Analytics scripts are used responsibly with privacy policies in place, though cookie consent mechanisms are lacking. Overall, the site is secure but could improve transparency and technical security headers to enhance defense in depth.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

National Science Foundation

Description:

NSF is an independent federal agency that supports science and engineering in all 50 states and U.S. territories by funding research and education proposals.

Key Services:
Research fundingEducation supportAward managementPublic access to funded projects
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Drupal 10Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCrazy EggAddToAnyjs-cookie
Frameworks:
US Web Design System (USWDS)
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

excellent

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Vulnerability disclosure policy
  • Privacy policy
  • Use of security analytics scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsDigital Analytics Program (DAP)Crazy Egg
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Crazy EggDigital Analytics Program (DAP)
Marketing Tools:
AddToAny
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Official U.S. government website with .gov domain

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Weak X-Content-Type-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "nosniff, nosniff"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

35/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:128.150.5.20/26 ip4:66.77.7.161/32 ip4:66.77.15.226/32 ip4:128.150.130.200/31 ip4:15.200.32.0/24 ip4:128.150.225.100 ip4:65.123.16.240/28 ip4:65.127.216.64/27 ip4:3.220.190.25 ip4:3.221.22.181 ip4:35.153.165.194 ip4:18.235.253.50 ip4:23.23.239.161 ip4:52.37.117.118 ip4:35.162.59.88 ip6:2620:10f:6001:5::20/121 include:spf.constantcontact.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:app.aventri.com include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarcemails@nsf.gov
Forensic Reports:fremailsdmarc@nsf.gov

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.nsf.gov
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Valid Until:7/27/2026 (325 days)
SANs:*.nsf.gov

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 18 days

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
high(17 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:128.150.221.244
AAAA Records:2620:10f:6002:221::244
Name Servers:
ns1.nsf.gov
ns2.nsf.gov
ns3.nsf.govWHOIS only
MX Records:
20: alt1.us.etp.fireeyegov.com
10: primary.us.etp.fireeyegov.com
40: alt3.us.etp.fireeyegov.com
30: alt2.us.etp.fireeyegov.com
SOA:Serial: 365354, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:143ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:128.150.5.20/26 ip4:66.77.7.161/32 ip4:66.77.15.226/32 ip4:128.150.130.200/31 ip4:15.200.32.0/24 ip4:128.150.225.100 ip4:65.123.16.240/28 ip4:65.127.216.64/27 ip4:3.220.190.25 ip4:3.221.22.181 ip4:35.153.165.194 ip4:18.235.253.50 ip4:23.23.239.161 ip4:52.37.117.118 ip4:35.162.59.88 ip6:2620:10f:6001:5::20/121 include:spf.constantcontact.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:app.aventri.com include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, ensuring a robust content management framework. It uses the U.S. Web Design System for consistent government styling and accessibility. Performance is optimized with asynchronous loading of analytics and tracking scripts. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with proper meta tags and SEO elements. Use of external analytics and marketing tools is balanced with privacy considerations. Hosting details are not explicit but likely government-managed infrastructure. Technical risks are minimal, with opportunities to improve security headers and cookie consent implementation.
Analyze Another Website