Skip to main content

Is ntrade.bezkomisijas.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - ntrade.bezkomisijas.lv Reviews

N

Is ntrade.bezkomisijas.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if ntrade.bezkomisijas.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5Drupal (mentioned in meta keywords)Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:25:46 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at bezkomisijas.lv currently serves as a security challenge page implemented by BitNinja, requiring visitors to complete a CAPTCHA to proceed. This indicates the domain is used primarily for bot mitigation and cybercrime prevention rather than traditional business or content delivery. The page supports multiple languages and integrates Google reCAPTCHA and Google Analytics for visitor validation and tracking. The technical infrastructure references outdated CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) in meta tags, likely remnants or placeholders rather than active CMS usage. Security posture is moderate due to CAPTCHA usage but lacks visible security headers and updated CMS versions, which could pose risks if the site were fully operational. Privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies are absent, and no contact or business information is provided, limiting trust and compliance assessment. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the domain's use by BitNinja suggests legitimacy in the security context. Overall, the site functions as a security gateway rather than a business-facing website, resulting in limited content and business insights.

Detected Technologies

Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5Drupal (mentioned in meta keywords)Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v2BitNinja security platform

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The domain bezkomisijas.lv appears to be utilized as a security checkpoint by BitNinja, a cybersecurity service provider specializing in bot mitigation and IP greylisting. There is no direct business information, contact details, or commercial content on the page. The business model implied is security service provision, focusing on filtering malicious traffic and preventing automated abuse. The target audience is general internet users attempting to access the site who may have been flagged for suspicious activity. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as absence of business credentials, suggests this domain is not intended for direct customer engagement but rather as a technical security layer. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The presence of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates some level of visitor tracking for security or analytics purposes.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the site is characterized by the use of BitNinja's greylist technology and CAPTCHA challenges to block automated or malicious visitors. This is a positive security control to mitigate bot traffic. However, the site shows signs of outdated CMS platforms in meta tags, which if active, could represent vulnerabilities. No security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) are evident from the provided data, and SSL/TLS configuration details are not available. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap. The CAPTCHA implementation and IP blocking are strengths, but overall security hygiene could be improved by updating CMS software, adding security headers, and publishing compliance documentation. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, limiting transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Update or remove outdated CMS references to prevent security risks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

The page is a security challenge page by BitNinja requiring CAPTCHA validation to proceed, indicating visitor access is blocked until validation.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

This website is a security validation page that requires visitors to complete a CAPTCHA to continue browsing. It is designed to block or filter automated or malicious traffic using BitNinja's greylist technology.

Key Services:
IP blocking and greylist managementCAPTCHA-based visitor validationCybercrime prevention
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5Drupal (mentioned in meta keywords)Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v2BitNinja security platform
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of CAPTCHA to prevent automated access
  • IP greylisting via BitNinja

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is a CAPTCHA challenge page by BitNinja to block automated or malicious traffic.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:89.149.219.49 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.87 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:89.149.219.49
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lvDNS only
ns2.areait.lvDNS only
ns3.areait.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: bezkomisijas.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072601, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:98ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:89.149.219.49 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.87 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site uses legacy CMS meta tags referencing Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are outdated and unsupported, posing potential security risks if active. The actual page content is minimal and serves as a CAPTCHA challenge powered by BitNinja. External scripts include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Google reCAPTCHA v2, indicating visitor tracking and bot mitigation. The page is mobile responsive to a basic degree and uses inline CSS for styling. No advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries are detected. Hosting provider details are not available. Performance is moderate given the simple page structure but could be improved with modern optimizations. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA roles or advanced features detected. SEO is poor due to minimal content and meta tags focused on CMS keywords rather than business relevance.
Analyze Another Website