Skip to main content

Is nuisancelaws.org a Scam? Security Check Results - nuisancelaws.org Reviews

N

Is nuisancelaws.org Safe? Security Analysis for Waiting for the redirectiron...

Check if nuisancelaws.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Statessmall
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5JavaScript
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 5:48:58 AM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website nuisancelaws.org is currently inaccessible beyond a security challenge page implemented by BitNinja.IO, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall or bot protection mechanism. The site content is minimal, showing only a redirect countdown and no substantive business or user-facing content. The domain is registered with privacy protection, obscuring registrant details, and uses outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5), which are known to have multiple security vulnerabilities. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information or business details are available on the site. This severely limits the ability to assess the business or security posture comprehensively.

Detected Technologies

Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

There is no visible business information or branding on the site. The domain was registered in 2017 and is privacy protected, which is not justified given the lack of any public business presence. The site appears to be either a placeholder, under development, or protected to prevent automated access. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or business models can be inferred from the available data. The lack of contact information and policies further reduces business credibility and trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak due to the use of outdated CMS software, lack of DNSSEC, absence of security headers, and no visible SSL/TLS configuration details. The presence of a WAF challenge page suggests some level of protection against automated threats, but the overall security hygiene is poor. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site does not demonstrate GDPR or privacy compliance. These factors collectively indicate a low security maturity level and potential exposure to common web vulnerabilities.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade all CMS platforms to their latest supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page shows a security challenge with automatic redirect and a security check by BitNinja.IO, indicating WAF or bot protection.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5JavaScript
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
25/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to WAF/security challenge page.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 38 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(351 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:68.183.24.17
Name Servers:
ns1.reclaimhosting.com
ns2.reclaimhosting.com
MX Records:
0: nuisancelaws.org
SOA:Serial: 2025071801, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:389ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses very outdated versions of Joomla and WordPress, which are no longer supported and contain numerous security flaws. The hosting provider is Reclaim Hosting, as indicated by the nameservers. The site includes JavaScript for a redirect countdown and browser integrity checks, but no modern frameworks or analytics tools are detected. The page performance is likely slow due to legacy code and lack of optimization. Mobile and accessibility features are poor, and SEO optimization is minimal with meta tags that are generic and outdated. The presence of a WAF challenge page limits content accessibility and analysis.
Analyze Another Website