Skip to main content

Is nvmotors.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - nvmotors.lv Reviews

N

Is nvmotors.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Waiting for the redirectiron...

Check if nvmotors.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:28:40 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website nvmotors.lv is currently inaccessible due to a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security challenge page implemented by BitNinja.IO. The page content is minimal, consisting primarily of a redirect countdown and browser integrity checks, preventing access to any substantive business or service information. Meta tags reveal the site is built on outdated CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5), which pose significant security risks if still in use. No WHOIS data could be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site exhibits poor digital maturity and lacks visible privacy or security policies, contact information, or trust indicators.

Detected Technologies

Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the WAF challenge and lack of accessible content, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The site appears to be either under maintenance, protected by aggressive security measures, or abandoned. The presence of outdated CMS versions suggests potential neglect or legacy infrastructure. No partnerships, certifications, or market positioning information is available. The external link to bitninja.io indicates reliance on third-party security services.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak based on visible indicators. The use of outdated CMS versions is a critical vulnerability. The presence of a WAF challenge page indicates some level of security hardening, but it also blocks legitimate access and complicates user experience. No security headers or SSL details were found in the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR and other regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade CMS platforms to supported, secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page shows a security check by BitNinja.IO with a redirect countdown and browser integrity check script, indicating a WAF or security challenge page blocking direct access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

Joomla!

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
25/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a WAF/security challenge page (BitNinja.IO).

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:65.21.89.62 include:relay.mailchannels.net +ip4:135.181.144.251 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 84 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:65.21.89.62
Name Servers:
ns1.beehosting.proDNS only
ns2.beehosting.proDNS only
ns3.beehosting.proDNS only
ns4.beehosting.proDNS only
MX Records:
0: nvmotors.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025073006, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:482ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:65.21.89.62 include:relay.mailchannels.net +ip4:135.181.144.251 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS technologies (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) which are no longer supported and pose significant security risks. The page is currently a security challenge page served by BitNinja.IO, including JavaScript-based browser integrity checks and automatic redirects. No modern analytics, tracking, or marketing tools are detected. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is likely slow due to the blocking mechanism and outdated infrastructure. No hosting provider or SSL configuration details are available.
Analyze Another Website