Skip to main content

Is nxebattery.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 诺信电子有限公司 Reviews

Is nxebattery.com Safe? Security Analysis for 诺信电子有限公司

Check if nxebattery.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyChinamedium
jQuery 1.11.0idangerous SwiperModernizrCountUp.js
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 6:28:51 PM
30
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

诺信电子有限公司是一家专注于高倍率聚合物锂电池研发、生产和销售的中国企业,隶属于昂佳科技集团。公司提供面向模型、电动工具、太阳能及风能储能、国家电网等多个领域的高安全性、高品质锂电池及成套系统解决方案。网站内容丰富,涵盖产品展示、新闻动态、技术支持及人才招聘等,体现了较强的业务覆盖和市场定位。技术基础包括使用jQuery、Swiper等成熟前端技术,网站设计响应式良好,适合移动设备访问。安全方面,网站未显示明显安全头部配置,且缺乏隐私政策和Cookie政策,存在合规风险。WHOIS信息缺失,域名注册状态不明,影响整体信任度。建议加强安全配置,完善合规文档,并核实域名注册信息以提升业务可信度。

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.11.0idangerous SwiperModernizrCountUp.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

诺信电子在中国锂电池制造行业中占据重要位置,专注于高倍率聚合物锂电池,服务于模型及新能源领域。其业务模式涵盖研发、制造及定制服务,面向专业客户和工业应用。网站通过多渠道展示产品和解决方案,配备采购平台链接,显示其B2B业务特征。公司规模中等,拥有国家高新技术企业资质,品牌形象专业且一致。合作伙伴包括阿里巴巴1688采购平台及相关行业网站,显示良好的合作生态。缺乏公开的隐私和安全政策可能影响客户信任和合规性。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (4)

191*******
136*******
075*******
137*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站采用HTTPS协议(推断基于资源链接),但未检测到关键安全HTTP头部如CSP、HSTS等,存在潜在安全风险。未发现安全事件响应联系方式或漏洞披露渠道,缺乏安全透明度。JavaScript库版本较旧,建议更新以防止已知漏洞。网站无明显敏感信息泄露,但缺少隐私政策和Cookie同意机制,可能违反GDPR等法规。整体安全成熟度中等偏下,需加强安全防护和合规措施。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

部署并配置关键安全HTTP头部(如Content-Security-Policy、Strict-Transport-Security)以提升防护能力。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

诺信电子有限公司

Description:

诺信电子致力于聚合物锂电研发与生产,为客户提供模型、电动工具、太阳能、风能发电储能、国家电网等领域高安全性,高品质电池及电池成套系统方案

Key Services:
高倍率聚合物锂电池研发电池生产电池定制电池系统解决方案
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.11.0idangerous SwiperModernizrCountUp.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS implied by external resource URLs

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Baidu Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Baidu site verification
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No HTTPS encryption

CRITICAL

GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

0/100
Score

No HTTPS encryption

CRITICAL

NIS2 requires appropriate technical measures including encryption

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

No HTTPS Encryption

CRITICAL

Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:222.73.134.202
Name Servers:
ns5.gzidc.comDNS only
ns6.gzidc.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.ym.163.com
SOA:Serial: 2013121625, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:400ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于传统前端技术栈,包括jQuery 1.11.0和Swiper滑块组件,技术成熟但部分库版本较旧。页面结构清晰,响应式设计良好,适配移动设备。SEO基础较好,包含关键词和描述元标签。未检测到使用主流CMS,可能为定制开发。性能表现中等,未见明显优化措施。缺少安全头部和隐私合规组件,存在技术债务和合规风险。建议技术升级和安全加固以支持业务持续发展。
Analyze Another Website