Skip to main content

Is nycwff.org a Scam? Security Check Results - nycwff.org Reviews

N

Is nycwff.org Safe? Security Analysis for nycwff.org

Check if nycwff.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Statessmall
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 1:01:50 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at nycwff.org appears to be minimal and currently only displays a message disallowing VPN or proxy usage. There is no substantive content, metadata, or business information available for analysis. The domain is registered since 2010 with privacy protection via Domains By Proxy, indicating a mature but privacy-conscious registration. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare DNS, but no further technical details or security headers are available. The lack of privacy policies, contact information, and security details suggests the website is either under development, restricted, or intentionally minimal. This limits the ability to assess the business model or market position effectively. Security posture is weak due to missing information and lack of visible HTTPS confirmation.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of business-related content, no clear market positioning, competitive advantages, or revenue streams can be identified. The domain age suggests an established presence, but no contact or company information is provided. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The website likely serves a niche or event-related purpose but lacks public-facing business intelligence data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is currently weak or unknown. No security headers or incident response contacts are found. The domain uses privacy protection which is common but reduces transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security policies are present. The minimal content and lack of HTTPS confirmation are critical issues. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities was found, but the lack of information prevents a thorough assessment.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and confirm HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is extremely minimal with only a message about disallowing VPN or proxies.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:nycwff.org
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/21/2025 (75 days)
SANs:nycwff.org, *.nycwff.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(596 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.73.51, 104.26.3.249, 104.26.2.249
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::ac43:4933, 2606:4700:20::681a:3f9, 2606:4700:20::681a:2f9
Name Servers:
elle.ns.cloudflare.com
elliot.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: nycwff-org.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2382707138, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:92ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mailjet.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently shows minimal HTML content with no metadata, scripts, or external resources detected. DNS is managed by Cloudflare, which may provide some security and performance benefits. No CMS or frameworks are identifiable from the provided data. The lack of content and technical details suggests the site is either under construction or intentionally minimal. There is an opportunity to modernize the technical stack, improve accessibility, and optimize performance once content is added.
Analyze Another Website