Skip to main content

Is obol.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Obol Collective Reviews

obol.org favicon

Is obol.org Safe? Security Analysis for Obol Collective

Check if obol.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
FramerGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:50:53 PM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Obol Collective is a technology-focused group dedicated to strengthening and sustaining Ethereum's consensus layer through tools, teams, and community collaboration. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on Ethereum blockchain technology. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including Framer for design and Cloudflare for DNS hosting, with Google Analytics integrated for visitor tracking. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain protections in place, though improvements are needed in security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is lacking as no privacy or cookie policies are present, and no consent mechanisms are implemented. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

FramerGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Obol Collective operates in the niche Ethereum blockchain technology sector, targeting developers and consensus layer stakeholders. Its business model centers on open-source tools and community-driven initiatives to support Ethereum's consensus sustainability. The domain age and privacy protection align with a mature technology project. The absence of direct contact information and formal policies suggests a community or decentralized organization rather than a traditional commercial enterprise. The website's market position is specialized, serving a technical audience with a focus on blockchain consensus mechanisms.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses Cloudflare DNS with domain status protections such as clientDeleteProhibited. However, it lacks key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency for security issues. The use of Google Analytics without visible cookie consent raises privacy compliance concerns. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by adopting best practices and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Obol Collective

Description:

A group of tools, teams, and communities dedicated to strengthening and sustaining Ethereum’s consensus layer.

Key Services:
Tools for Ethereum consensus layerCommunity collaborationSustainability initiatives
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
FramerGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses Framer for design and hosting with Cloudflare DNS.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.psm.knowbe4.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:aa85badb8f664738a3ca9bd5e1a0fceb@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net
Forensic Reports:email@obol.tech

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 70 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:obol.org
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/16/2025 (70 days)
SANs:obol.org, *.obol.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: vmpifqj7fsalsufqfszzk7daeyscqqh5hyvq63ldxti43bnlz7eq.mx-verification.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(964 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:104.26.1.138, 172.67.73.48, 104.26.0.138
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::681a:8a, 2606:4700:20::681a:18a, 2606:4700:20::ac43:4930
Name Servers:
jule.ns.cloudflare.com
rick.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
15: vmpifqj7fsalsufqfszzk7daeyscqqh5hyvq63ldxti43bnlz7eq.mx-verification.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382549444, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:85ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.psm.knowbe4.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern design and prototyping platform, and hosted with Cloudflare DNS services. It uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors detected. However, the absence of accessibility features and security headers indicates areas for technical improvement. The domain's long history and DNS protections contribute positively to the technical risk profile.
Analyze Another Website