Skip to main content

Is obol.tech a Scam? Security Check Results - Obol Collective Reviews

obol.tech favicon

Is obol.tech Safe? Security Analysis for Obol Collective

Check if obol.tech is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
Framer (website builder)Google AnalyticsCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:50:16 PM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Obol Collective is a technology-focused organization dedicated to supporting and sustaining Ethereum's consensus layer through a suite of tools, teams, and community initiatives. The website presents a professional and modern design built using Framer, targeting Ethereum developers and blockchain stakeholders. The technical infrastructure includes Cloudflare DNS and Google Analytics for user tracking, with a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain registration locks, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is legitimate and trustworthy within its niche but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

Framer (website builder)Google AnalyticsCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Obol Collective operates within the blockchain technology sector, focusing on Ethereum consensus layer tooling and community collaboration. Its business model revolves around open-source development and ecosystem support rather than direct commercial services. The domain age and registration details suggest a stable presence, although privacy protection is used for registrant anonymity. The site lacks explicit contact details and formal policies, which may limit direct business engagement but aligns with community-driven projects. The use of Google Analytics indicates some level of user behavior analysis, supporting growth and engagement strategies.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and domain status locks to protect against unauthorized changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by adopting best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Obol Collective

Description:

A group of tools, teams, and communities dedicated to strengthening and sustaining Ethereum’s consensus layer.

Key Services:
Ethereum consensus layer toolsCommunity collaborationSustainability initiatives for Ethereum
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Framer (website builder)Google AnalyticsCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.psm.knowbe4.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:aa85badb8f664738a3ca9bd5e1a0fceb@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net
Forensic Reports:email@obol.tech

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 71 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:obol.org
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/16/2025 (71 days)
SANs:obol.org, *.obol.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: vmpifqj7fsalsufqfszzk7daeyscqqh5hyvq63ldxti43bnlz7eq.mx-verification.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(965 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.73.48, 104.26.1.138, 104.26.0.138
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::681a:8a, 2606:4700:20::681a:18a, 2606:4700:20::ac43:4930
Name Servers:
jule.ns.cloudflare.com
rick.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
15: vmpifqj7fsalsufqfszzk7daeyscqqh5hyvq63ldxti43bnlz7eq.mx-verification.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382549444, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:64ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.psm.knowbe4.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern web design platform, and integrates Google Analytics for tracking. Hosting details are not explicit but likely leverage Framer's infrastructure and Cloudflare DNS services. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with no major errors detected. However, the absence of advanced security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security hardening. No forms or data collection fields were detected in the analyzed HTML, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction capabilities.
Analyze Another Website