Skip to main content

Is obsidian.finance a Scam? Security Check Results - Obsidian Finance Reviews

obsidian.finance favicon

Is obsidian.finance Safe? Security Analysis for Obsidian Finance

Check if obsidian.finance is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/amedium
ReactNext.jsGoogle FontsGoogle Analytics
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:18:32 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Obsidian Finance operates as a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform primarily focused on the Cronos blockchain ecosystem, offering a smart DEX aggregator alongside services such as swapping, staking, farming, launchpad, NFT lending, and community engagement. The platform targets crypto traders, DeFi users, and blockchain investors, positioning itself as a multi-chain DeFi ecosystem with a comprehensive suite of financial services. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and navigation, though it lacks some standard compliance pages and explicit contact information. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, with integration of Google Fonts and Google Analytics for tracking. The platform demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, though accessibility features are basic. The use of HTTPS ensures secure communication, but the absence of security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates room for improvement in security posture and privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks visible security headers, vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and incident response contact information. The WHOIS data is privacy-protected and limited, which is common in the DeFi space but reduces transparency. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and no adult or explicit content is present, making the site safe for general audiences. Overall, Obsidian Finance presents a solid DeFi platform with a good technical foundation and user experience but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsGoogle FontsGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Obsidian Finance is positioned as an important player in the decentralized finance sector, focusing on the Cronos blockchain and zkCronos. Its business model revolves around providing a multi-service DeFi ecosystem including DEX aggregation, staking, farming, launchpad, and NFT lending. The platform targets crypto enthusiasts and investors seeking efficient trading and earning opportunities. The presence of a wiki and active Discord community suggests an engaged user base and commitment to education and support. However, the lack of public company registration details and contact information may limit institutional trust. The platform leverages modern web technologies and integrates analytics for user insights, indicating a data-driven approach. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data, suggesting a standalone operation or early-stage ecosystem development.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of Obsidian Finance is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, which are best practices for incident reporting and transparency. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No contact channels for security incidents or abuse were found, which could delay incident response. The use of Google Analytics without clear privacy compliance mechanisms further highlights privacy risks. Overall, while the platform demonstrates basic security hygiene, it should enhance its security framework and compliance posture to build greater trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Obsidian Finance

Description:

Smart Dex Aggregaror ecosystem with Swap, Stake and Launchpad. Trade, Stake, Earn and Launch on Cronos blockchain

Key Services:
DEX AggregatorSwapLiquidity PoolsFarmsStakingFixed StakingLaunchpadNFT LendingRewardsAnalytics
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsGoogle FontsGoogle Analytics
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Cronos blockchainzkCronos blockchain
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (implied by platform)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a DeFi platform focused on Cronos blockchain ecosystem

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 68 days

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
aaden.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
veronica.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: obsidian-finance.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2382422622, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:251ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and improved performance. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Google Analytics for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. However, the absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or static site approach. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the number of JavaScript chunks loaded. There is no explicit hosting provider identified from the HTML content. The site lacks advanced accessibility features and some SEO optimizations could be improved by adding structured data or more comprehensive meta tags. Overall, the technical implementation supports a good user experience but has opportunities for modernization and enhanced security.
Analyze Another Website