Skip to main content

Is oceanconservancy.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Ocean Conservancy Reviews

oceanconservancy.org favicon

Is oceanconservancy.org Safe? Security Analysis for Ocean Conservancy

Check if oceanconservancy.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitUnited Stateslarge
jQueryNew Relic Browser monitoringCloudflare DNSWordPressYoast SEO+4 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 1:28:40 PM
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Ocean Conservancy is a well-established non-profit organization dedicated to protecting the ocean through science-based solutions and public advocacy. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a professional design, consistent branding, and clear messaging targeted at a general audience interested in ocean conservation. The organization leverages modern web technologies including WordPress CMS, analytics tools like Google Analytics and New Relic, and marketing platforms such as Visual Website Optimizer. The domain age and WHOIS data confirm the legitimacy and long-standing presence of the organization. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and Cloudflare DNS usage; however, there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent mechanism but lacks a clearly accessible privacy policy and terms of service in the analyzed content.

Detected Technologies

jQueryNew Relic Browser monitoringCloudflare DNSWordPressYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerVisual Website Optimizer (VWO)Gravity FormsContact Form 7

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Ocean Conservancy operates in the non-profit sector focusing on environmental conservation, specifically ocean health. Its business model centers on advocacy, education, and science-driven initiatives. The website targets environmentally conscious individuals, policymakers, and partners. The organization maintains a strong market position with a domain registered since 2001 and active social media presence. The use of multiple marketing and analytics tools indicates a data-driven approach to outreach and engagement. No evidence of commercial subsidiaries or parent companies was found, suggesting an independent non-profit structure.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, reducing risk of unauthorized domain transfers. The use of Cloudflare DNS adds resilience. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are notable gaps. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which could hinder transparency and trust in security matters. Forms use reCAPTCHA scripts, indicating some protection against automated abuse. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced with additional best practices and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage or footer.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ocean Conservancy

Description:

Ocean Conservancy is working with you to protect the ocean from today’s greatest challenges. We create science-based solutions for a healthy ocean.

Key Services:
Ocean protection advocacyScience-based solutions for ocean healthPublic engagement and education
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryNew Relic Browser monitoringCloudflare DNSWordPressYoast SEOGoogle Tag ManagerVisual Website Optimizer (VWO)Gravity FormsContact Form 7
Frameworks:
WordPress Gutenberg
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • Use of reCAPTCHA scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)New Relic Browser
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Tracking Pixels:
New Relic Browser
Marketing Tools:
VWOCookiebot
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well maintained

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphoneform

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

95/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.e-activist.com include:spf.dynect.net include:mailgun.org include:_spf.causemail.causemo.com include:_spf.qualtrics.com ~all TXT v=spf1 include:_spf.psm.knowbe4.com -all
DNS Lookups:7/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@dmarc.everest.email
Forensic Reports:dmarc_fr@dmarc.everest.email
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 34 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:oceanconservancy.org
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/11/2025 (34 days)
SANs:oceanconservancy.org, *.oceanconservancy.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(3140 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.66.134.105, 172.66.140.61
AAAA Records:2606:4700:10::ac42:8c3d, 2606:4700:10::ac42:8669
Name Servers:
ali.ns.cloudflare.com
curt.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: oceanconservancy-org.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2382510778, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:100ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
TXT v=spf1 include:_spf.psm.knowbe4.com -all v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.e-activist.com include:spf.dynect.net include:mailgun.org include:_spf.causemail.causemo.com include:_spf.qualtrics.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with Gutenberg blocks, leveraging jQuery and several third-party scripts for analytics, marketing, and form handling. Hosting and DNS are managed via Network Solutions and Cloudflare respectively. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features appear basic. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. The technical stack is modern and well-integrated, though some technical debt may exist in the form of missing security headers and incomplete privacy disclosures.
Analyze Another Website