Skip to main content

Is ocspektrum.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - OC Spektrum, s.r.o. Reviews

ocspektrum.cz favicon

Is ocspektrum.cz Safe? Security Analysis for OC Spektrum, s.r.o.

Check if ocspektrum.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailCzech Republicmedium
JavaScriptCSSHTML5Google Tag ManagerCookies Giant Consent Management+2 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 1:40:43 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

OC Spektrum, s.r.o. operates a medium-sized shopping center in the Czech Republic, offering a variety of retail shops, restaurants, and parking facilities. The website presents a professional and user-friendly interface with clear navigation and relevant content targeting general shoppers and local visitors. The business holds recognized certifications such as BREEAM In USE and has received industry awards, reinforcing its market credibility. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries, cookie consent management, and Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and privacy compliance evident through comprehensive cookie and privacy policies. However, explicit security headers and incident response information are absent, representing areas for improvement. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with no signs of malicious activity or content blocking.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSHTML5Google Tag ManagerCookies Giant Consent ManagementFlickity SliderGoogle Maps API

đź§ AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The shopping center targets local consumers and visitors seeking retail and dining experiences. Its business model revolves around leasing retail spaces and hosting events to attract foot traffic. The presence of certifications and awards suggests a competitive positioning in the commercial retail sector. The website's integration with social media platforms and partner organizations indicates a collaborative ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include tenant rents, event sponsorships, and parking fees. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site may reflect a preference for centralized contact through web forms or physical visits. Growth indicators include active event promotion and digital engagement via Instagram and Facebook.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content, and third-party scripts appear standard and reputable. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No published security policy or incident response contacts were found, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and mitigation. The site does not appear to use a security.txt file or disclose vulnerability disclosure procedures. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.

✨Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

OC Spektrum, s.r.o.

Description:

OC Spektrum is a shopping center offering 17 shops, 7 restaurants and cafes, and 136 parking spaces. It hosts various events and promotions and provides a map and contact information for visitors.

Key Services:
Retail shopsRestaurants and cafesParking facilitiesEvent hosting
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSHTML5Google Tag ManagerCookies Giant Consent ManagementFlickity SliderGoogle Maps API
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Cookies Giant Consent Management
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Weak X-Content-Type-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "nosniff, nosniff"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

đź“§Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:80.95.105.167 include:spf.revisio.cz include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 52 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:185.59.208.188
Name Servers:
ns.forpsi.czDNS only
ns.forpsi.it
ns.forpsi.net
MX Records:
10: ocspektrum-cz.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025071101, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:130ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:80.95.105.167 include:spf.revisio.cz include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

⚡Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

đź”§Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern front-end stack with JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5, leveraging libraries such as Flickity for sliders and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Cookie consent is managed by Cookies Giant, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility considerations, though these could be improved. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. The site structure supports SEO best practices with meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential reliance on third-party scripts without explicit vulnerability management.
Analyze Another Website