Skip to main content

Is odigy.com a Scam? Security Check Results - ODIGY Reviews

odigy.com favicon

Is odigy.com Safe? Security Analysis for ODIGY

Check if odigy.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/asmall
WordPressPHPJavaScriptCSSGoogle Fonts+1 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 11:54:32 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

ODIGY is a small design studio specializing in identity, web, and print design services, with a professional portfolio showcasing various branding projects. The company has a long-standing domain registration dating back to 2003, indicating an established presence in the design industry. The website is built on WordPress using modern frameworks and technologies, with good mobile optimization and a professional design quality. However, the site lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, which impacts its compliance posture. Security-wise, HTTPS is enabled and domain transfer is restricted, but DNSSEC is not enabled and no security headers are detected, representing areas for improvement. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and credible but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPJavaScriptCSSGoogle FontsFont Awesome

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ODIGY operates as a niche design studio focused on branding and identity services, targeting businesses and organizations seeking professional design solutions. The business model is service-oriented with a portfolio-driven marketing approach. The company leverages WordPress as its platform, indicating a cost-effective and flexible digital infrastructure. The lack of detailed business contact information such as phone numbers or physical addresses suggests a primarily digital or boutique operation. The presence of a Facebook page indicates some social media engagement. The company appears stable and credible with no suspicious domain registration patterns.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@odigy.com

Company Registration

Registration Number:

Chamber of Commerce

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy pages are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The site does not actively use tracking or analytics scripts, reducing privacy risks but also limiting insight into user behavior. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

ODIGY

Description:

ODIGY is a design studio specializing in identity, web, and print design services. The website showcases a portfolio of identity projects, indicating a focus on branding and visual identity creation.

Key Services:
Identity designWeb designPrint design
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPJavaScriptCSSGoogle FontsFont Awesome
Frameworks:
Kirki (WordPress Customizer Framework)SiteOrigin Panels
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel (commented out script)
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel (commented out)Google Fonts
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based design studio portfolio.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:s700.smtp-spf.sureserver.com ~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:dkim(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:195.42.142.18
Name Servers:
ns1.s700.sureserver.comDNS only
ns2.s700.sureserver.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: mail.odigy.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:s700.smtp-spf.sureserver.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including PHP, JavaScript, CSS, Google Fonts, and Font Awesome. It uses Kirki and SiteOrigin Panels frameworks for customization and layout. Hosting is managed via eNom registrar with DNS servers on sureserver.com. Performance is moderate with caching and minified assets in use. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph tags present. No major technical debt or vulnerabilities are evident from the HTML content. Opportunities exist to improve security configurations and privacy compliance.
Analyze Another Website