Skip to main content

Is odvaznezeny.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - odvaznezeny.cz Reviews

O

Is odvaznezeny.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Security Verification

Check if odvaznezeny.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicsmall
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 6:13:41 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website odvaznezeny.cz is currently inaccessible beyond a security verification page that employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 to prevent automated access. This indicates a protective measure likely to mitigate bot traffic or abuse but results in no actual business or content being accessible for analysis. The domain is registered since 2016 with a Czech registrar, suggesting a stable registration history, but no further business details or contact information are available on the page. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 and Google reCAPTCHA, but lacks visible security headers or privacy policies. The absence of content and policies limits the ability to assess compliance or business credibility. Overall, the site appears to be in a protective mode rather than serving end-user content.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the content being blocked by a security verification page, no business intelligence data such as company name, services, market position, or contact details could be extracted. The domain age and registrar are consistent with a Czech-based entity, but no further business insights are available. There are no detected partnerships, subsidiaries, or related domains. The lack of visible business information suggests either a very small operation or a site under maintenance or restricted access.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture shows some positive aspects such as the use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to prevent automated abuse, indicating awareness of bot threats. However, the absence of security headers like CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security maturity. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no contact channels for security issues are visible. The SSL/TLS configuration cannot be fully assessed from the HTML content alone. The site would benefit from enhanced security headers, clear security policies, and incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page is a security verification challenge using Google reCAPTCHA v3 with no actual website content accessible.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.3.3Google reCAPTCHA v3
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • HTTPS implied by origin-trial meta tag referencing https://www.google.com

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a security verification page using Google reCAPTCHA v3.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 51 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.autoelektrika-mb.odvaznezeny.cz
Issuer:R11
Valid Until:9/22/2025 (51 days)
SANs:*.autoelektrika-mb.odvaznezeny.cz, autoelektrika-mb.odvaznezeny.cz, odvaznezeny.cz

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:185.151.30.165
AAAA Records:2a07:7800::165
Name Servers:
ns1.stackdns.comDNS only
ns1.webkitty.euWHOIS only
ns2.stackdns.comDNS only
ns2.webkitty.euWHOIS only
ns3.stackdns.comDNS only
ns3.webkitty.euWHOIS only
ns4.stackdns.comDNS only
ns4.webkitty.euWHOIS only
MX Records:
10: mx.stackmail.com
SOA:Serial: 1717245379, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:95ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.stackmail.com a mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection. The HTML is minimal and focused solely on the security verification form with a hidden input for the reCAPTCHA token. No CMS or backend platform is detectable from the HTML. External resources are loaded from jsdelivr.net and google.com domains. The page is mobile responsive at a basic level due to Bootstrap but lacks SEO meta tags or structured data. Performance is moderate given minimal content but user experience is poor due to lack of accessible content. No analytics or marketing tools beyond reCAPTCHA are detected.
Analyze Another Website