Skip to main content

Is oeh-ufg.at a Scam? Security Check Results - ÖH — Hochschüler*innenschaft der Kunstuniversität Linz Reviews

oeh-ufg.at favicon

Is oeh-ufg.at Safe? Security Analysis for ÖH — Hochschüler*innenschaft der Kunstuniversität Linz

Check if oeh-ufg.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationAustriasmall
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1MediaElement.jsUncode ThemeContact Form 7+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 7:28:37 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website represents the official Students’ Union (ÖH) of the University of Arts Linz, Austria. It serves as a platform to provide students with organizational information, advisory services, funding opportunities, and transparency reports. The site targets students and stakeholders within the university community, positioning itself as a trusted non-profit educational organization. The bilingual presentation (German and English) enhances accessibility for a wider audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern theme and plugins, ensuring a stable and moderately performant infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and nonce protections, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned cookie and privacy policies. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with its educational mission.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1MediaElement.jsUncode ThemeContact Form 7Uncode Privacy plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The ÖH Kunstuniversität Linz operates as a non-profit student union affiliated with the university, providing essential services such as student representation, counseling, funding, and transparency. Its market position is strong within the university ecosystem, supported by official partnerships and social media presence. The business model focuses on service provision rather than revenue generation. The organization maintains a clear structure and communicates effectively with its target audience. Growth indicators include multilingual support and active social media channels. The partnership with the university domain underscores legitimacy and operational integration.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and nonce tokens are used to protect forms against CSRF attacks. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency in security management. The absence of exposed sensitive data and the use of security/privacy plugins are positive indicators. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could benefit from enhanced security policies and headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense against web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

ÖH — Hochschüler*innenschaft der Kunstuniversität Linz

Description:

Students’ Union representing the students of the University of Arts Linz, providing advisory, funding, transparency, and contact services.

Key Services:
Student representationAdvisory services (psychological counseling, insurance, plagiarism check)Funding (social pot, tuition fund, excursion and project grants)Transparency (annual reports, protocols, election results)Contact and secretariat services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1MediaElement.jsUncode ThemeContact Form 7Uncode Privacy plugin
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Nonce tokens added to forms for CSRF protection
  • Use of security plugins (Uncode Privacy)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is bilingual (German and English) with language selection.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

72/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:193.170.96.0/22 ip4:172.25.71.89/32 ip4:10.104.0.0/24 ip4:10.104.2.10/32 ip4:88.151.78.132/32 ip4:95.172.90.0/24 ip4:216.147.218.8/30 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-eu.exlibrisgroup.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:postmaster@kunstuni-linz.at
Forensic Reports:postmaster@kunstuni-linz.at

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:193.170.96.78
Name Servers:
ns1.internet.ufg.ac.atDNS only
ns3.internet.ufg.ac.atDNS only
MX Records:
25: SMTP-GW-03.zid-dienste.ufg.ac.at
25: SMTP-GW-02.zid-dienste.ufg.ac.at
1000: kunstunilinz-at02b.mail.protection.outlook.com
20: SMTP-GW.ufg.ac.at
25: SMTP-GW-04.zid-dienste.ufg.ac.at
SOA:Serial: 2025082700, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:266ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ip4:193.170.96.0/22 ip4:172.25.71.89/32 ip4:10.104.0.0/24 ip4:10.104.2.10/32 ip4:88.151.78.132/32 ip4:95.172.90.0/24 ip4:216.147.218.8/30 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-eu.exlibrisgroup.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS version 6.8.2 with the Uncode theme and plugins like Contact Form 7 and Uncode Privacy. It leverages jQuery and MediaElement.js for frontend functionality. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The site lacks some modern security headers and advanced accessibility features. SEO is adequately addressed with meta tags and structured content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could be modernized with enhanced security and accessibility standards.
Analyze Another Website