Skip to main content

Is omart.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Mareks Odumins Reviews

omart.lv favicon

Is omart.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Mareks Odumins

Check if omart.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Maps APISlider Revolution+4 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:09:20 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website omart.lv is a personal portfolio site for Mareks Odumins, an artist who paints using a brush held in his mouth due to paralysis. The site primarily showcases his artwork and shares his inspirational life story. The business model appears to be centered on personal branding, art promotion, and possibly donations or sales of artwork. The website is built on WordPress using popular plugins and frameworks, indicating a moderate level of technical maturity. HTTPS is properly configured, and some security best practices like Google reCAPTCHA are implemented. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, and no explicit contact information is provided, which impacts privacy compliance and business credibility scores. Overall, the site is safe, well-designed, and serves its purpose as an artist portfolio, but could improve in compliance and security hardening.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Maps APISlider RevolutionVisual Portfolio pluginUltimate VC AddonsContact Form 7Google reCAPTCHA

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The site targets art enthusiasts and supporters of disabled artists, leveraging a unique personal story to engage visitors. It operates as a small-scale personal brand without evident commercial infrastructure or partnerships. The content quality and branding are consistent, but the absence of formal policies and contact details limits trust signals. The site does not appear to engage in advertising or extensive analytics, focusing instead on content presentation. Growth potential may be tied to expanding audience reach and formalizing business operations such as sales or commissions.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

2*****@gmail.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the lack of security headers and absence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms like security.txt reduce the overall security maturity. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The site would benefit from implementing additional HTTP security headers and formalizing incident response contact points to enhance trust and resilience.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Mareks Odumins

Description:

The website represents Mareks Odumins, an artist who paints using a brush held in his mouth due to paralysis. The site showcases his paintings and shares his personal story and artistic journey.

Key Services:
Art portfolio displayInspirational storytellingDonation solicitation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryGoogle Maps APISlider RevolutionVisual Portfolio pluginUltimate VC AddonsContact Form 7Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks:
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a personal artist portfolio with inspirational story

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.162 include:_spf.if28.nano.lv +a +mx ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.68.162
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: omart.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072610, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:172ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.68.162 include:_spf.if28.nano.lv +a +mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with WPBakery Page Builder and several plugins including Slider Revolution, Visual Portfolio, Ultimate VC Addons, and Contact Form 7. It leverages jQuery and Google Maps API for interactive features. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and moderate performance. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The site uses lazy loading for images and modern CSS techniques, indicating some attention to performance optimization.
Analyze Another Website