Skip to main content

Is omeka.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Digital Scholar Reviews

D

Is omeka.net Safe? Security Analysis for Digital Scholar

Check if omeka.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
jQuery 3.2.1Google Fonts (Lora, Oswald)Custom CSS and JavaScript
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 9:10:32 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Omeka.net is a specialized hosted web publishing platform designed for cultural institutions to share digital collections and create interactive online exhibits. Operated by Digital Scholar, the platform offers a SaaS model with tiered plans targeting museums, educators, and archivists. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content focused on digital heritage. Technically, the site uses a modest tech stack including jQuery and Google Fonts, with custom CSS and JavaScript, and is built on the Omeka CMS platform. Mobile optimization and accessibility are adequate but could be improved. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy and terms of service present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR indicators. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which slightly reduces trust but does not contradict the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and well-targeted to its niche audience.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.2.1Google Fonts (Lora, Oswald)Custom CSS and JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Omeka.net occupies a niche market in the cultural heritage technology sector, providing a hosted platform for digital collections and exhibits. Its competitive advantage lies in its focus on media-rich storytelling combined with structured metadata management. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, appealing to small to medium cultural institutions. The parent organization, Digital Scholar, lends credibility and domain expertise. The platform's ecosystem includes plugins and themes tailored for cultural content. Growth potential exists in expanding features and improving compliance and security. Partnerships appear limited but include Digital Scholar as a key related entity. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear service offerings and user engagement via newsletters.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of Omeka.net is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory, but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is published, and no incident response contacts are provided. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the front-end code. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a content publishing platform but could be enhanced by implementing security headers, formalizing incident response, and improving privacy compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Digital Scholar

Description:

Omeka.net is a hosted web publishing platform service for cultural institutions to share digital collections and create media-rich online exhibits.

Key Services:
Hosted Omeka web publishingDigital collections managementInteractive digital exhibitsMultiple themes and plugins
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.2.1Google Fonts (Lora, Oswald)Custom CSS and JavaScript
Platforms:
Hosted web platform
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1024-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 48 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
18 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(3438 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:34.234.177.107
Name Servers:
ns-1448.awsdns-53.org
ns-1965.awsdns-53.co.uk
ns-22.awsdns-02.com
ns-540.awsdns-03.net
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:487ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Omeka CMS platform with a lightweight tech stack including jQuery 3.2.1 and Google Fonts. The site uses custom CSS and JavaScript for styling and interactivity. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage beyond fonts and jQuery from Google CDN. Mobile optimization is good with responsive themes demonstrated. SEO is basic with meta description present but no Open Graph or structured data detected. Accessibility is basic with skip links but no ARIA landmarks or advanced features. The lack of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Analyze Another Website