Is omeka.org Safe? Security Analysis for Digital Scholar
Check if omeka.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Omeka.org is the official website for Omeka, an established open-source web-publishing platform designed for libraries, museums, archives, and scholarly collections. The project is managed by Digital Scholar and offers multiple products including Omeka S, Omeka Classic, and a hosted service Omeka.net. The platform targets institutions and educators seeking to create and share digital exhibits with ease. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and product information. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies such as jQuery and Google Fonts, hosted under Amazon Registrar with DNS on AWS Route53. While the site is accessible and well-structured, it lacks published privacy, cookie, and security policies, which impacts compliance and trust scores. Security posture is moderate with domain registration protections in place but missing DNSSEC and security headers. Overall, the site is trustworthy and safe for general audiences, with no adult or questionable content detected.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Omeka.org operates in the technology sector, specifically focusing on open-source software for digital collections and scholarly exhibits. The business model includes free software downloads, hosted services, and managed support offerings. The project has a long history dating back to 2007, indicating maturity and stability. Its partnership with Digital Scholar and the offering of multiple product lines position it well in the niche market of digital humanities and cultural heritage institutions. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a primarily community-driven and support forum-based engagement model. The website's clean design and clear product segmentation support user understanding and adoption. Growth opportunities may lie in expanding managed services and enhancing compliance transparency.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security posture of omeka.org is moderate. The domain is privacy protected with strong domain status locks preventing unauthorized changes, which is a positive trust indicator. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided data, which are areas for improvement. The site uses HTTPS (implied by modern web standards and external links) but no explicit SSL configuration details were provided. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. The lack of published security policies, vulnerability disclosure, or incident response information limits transparency and preparedness perception. Overall, the site is secure enough for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced security best practices and policy disclosures.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS integrity and security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Digital Scholar
Omeka is a free, flexible, and open source web-publishing platform for the display of library, museum, archives, and scholarly collections and exhibitions. It offers easy setup for launching online archives or exhibitions.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Twitter, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
Weak DKIM Key
HIGHDKIM selector 'google' uses 856-bit key
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 87 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM5 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings