Skip to main content

Is omni.ls a Scam? Security Check Results - omni.ls Reviews

omni.ls favicon

Is omni.ls Safe? Security Analysis for Omni LS

Check if omni.ls is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsChakra UICloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 5:32:31 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Omni LS is a technology-focused company specializing in liquid staking services for cryptocurrency users. The website presents a modern and professional interface built with React and Next.js frameworks, leveraging Chakra UI for styling and Cloudflare for DNS services. The platform targets blockchain investors interested in staking and portfolio management across multiple networks. While the technical infrastructure is modern and performance is moderate, the site lacks critical privacy and security documentation such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and security headers. The domain is newly registered in September 2023, consistent with a startup in the blockchain space. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with better compliance and incident response information.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsChakra UICloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Omni LS operates in the emerging liquid staking market, offering services that enable users to mint vTokens and manage staking rewards across various blockchain networks. The business model appears to be service-oriented, focusing on DeFi users and crypto investors. The company is positioned as a small but technologically advanced player, leveraging partnerships such as with bifrost.io. The lack of detailed business and contact information limits full assessment of credibility and growth potential. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates a focus on user behavior tracking, but privacy compliance is minimal.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts reduce the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, which are recommended for transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Omni Liquid Staking

Key Services:
Liquid stakingToken swappingPortfolio management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsChakra UICloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Next.jsChakra UI
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a modern React/Next.js application with Chakra UI styling

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 59 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
aiden.ns.cloudflare.com
tricia.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381367282, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:93ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js stack with Chakra UI for UI components, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, which is standard but requires proper privacy disclosures. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in SEO and accessibility could be made. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a scalable and user-friendly platform.
Analyze Another Website