Skip to main content

Is omni.network a Scam? Security Check Results - Omni Reviews

omni.network favicon

Is omni.network Safe? Security Analysis for Omni

Check if omni.network is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Instrument Sans, Inter)jQuery 3.5.1Vidzflow video embedsGoogle Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:09:54 PM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Omni Network operates as an abstraction layer within the Ethereum ecosystem, enabling developers to seamlessly access users and liquidity across multiple rollups without requiring contract upgrades. The company positions itself as a critical infrastructure provider facilitating cross-chain interoperability and user reach. Their partnerships with prominent venture capital firms such as Pantera Capital, Two Sigma Ventures, and Coinbase Ventures, alongside participation in Binance's largest Launchpool, underscore their strong market presence and credibility. The platform offers services including Omni SolverNet integration and staking of the $OMNI token, targeting blockchain developers and ecosystem builders. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Fonts, jQuery, and embedded video content via Vidzflow. The site demonstrates excellent design quality, mobile responsiveness, and SEO optimization. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, indicating moderate user tracking practices. Hosting is managed via Webflow's CDN, contributing to fast performance and reliable uptime. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and promotes a $500,000 Immunefi bug bounty program, reflecting a proactive security posture. However, the absence of visible security headers and a cookie consent mechanism suggests areas for improvement in security best practices and privacy compliance. The WHOIS data is incomplete due to TLD limitations, lacking registrant details and domain age, which introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration transparency. Nevertheless, the overall trustworthiness is supported by strong business signals and security initiatives. Overall, Omni Network presents a professional, secure, and well-maintained digital presence aligned with its role in the blockchain infrastructure sector. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent for GDPR compliance, publishing incident response policies, and improving WHOIS transparency to bolster trust further.

Detected Technologies

Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Instrument Sans, Inter)jQuery 3.5.1Vidzflow video embedsGoogle Tag Manager (gtag.js)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Omni Network is strategically positioned as an essential infrastructure provider within the Ethereum and broader blockchain ecosystem. Its business model focuses on enabling cross-rollup interoperability and liquidity access, which is critical for scaling decentralized applications. The company benefits from strong venture capital backing and partnerships with leading industry players, enhancing its competitive advantage. Revenue streams likely include staking services and developer integrations. The target customer segments are blockchain developers and ecosystem builders seeking to expand user reach efficiently. Growth indicators include participation in Binance Launchpool and a substantial community presence across Discord, Twitter, and Telegram. The partnership ecosystem is robust, featuring top-tier investors and collaborators, which supports long-term sustainability and market penetration.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Omni Network exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and a significant bug bounty program hosted on Immunefi, demonstrating commitment to vulnerability management. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a cookie consent mechanism indicate gaps in security best practices and privacy compliance. No direct contact information for incident response or security policies are published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The incomplete WHOIS data reduces transparency but is likely due to TLD restrictions rather than malicious intent. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by adopting additional headers, publishing security policies, and improving privacy mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Omni

Description:

Omni is the abstraction layer for the Ethereum ecosystem, allowing developers to access all the users and liquidity across rollups without upgrading their contracts.

Key Services:
Omni SolverNet integrationCross-rollup user and liquidity accessStaking $OMNI token
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Webflow CMSGoogle Fonts (Instrument Sans, Inter)jQuery 3.5.1Vidzflow video embedsGoogle Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Frameworks:
Webflow
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Bug bounty program via Immunefi

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

20/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:696dd6401ffd41c4a501eb2625e35b41@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 73 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:51.21.126.187, 13.49.111.177, 16.16.119.222
Name Servers:
maisie.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
patryk.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382478678, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:55ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website leverages a modern and scalable technical infrastructure primarily built on Webflow CMS, ensuring ease of content management and rapid deployment. The use of Google Fonts and jQuery is standard and well-supported, while embedded video content enhances user engagement. Google Tag Manager integration supports analytics and marketing efforts but should be balanced with privacy considerations. Hosting via Webflow's CDN contributes to fast load times and reliable availability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Opportunities exist to improve technical security configurations and privacy compliance mechanisms to reduce risk and enhance user trust.
Analyze Another Website