Skip to main content

Is omniatech.io a Scam? Security Check Results - OMNIA Protocol Reviews

omniatech.io favicon

Is omniatech.io Safe? Security Analysis for OMNIA Protocol

Check if omniatech.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Gatsby 4.24.6ReactGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarFacebook Pixel+3 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:44:38 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

OMNIA Protocol operates as a technology company specializing in secure and compliant blockchain infrastructure services, focusing on providing secure RPC endpoints for Ethereum and Layer 2 networks, as well as DePIN infrastructure for autonomous AI agents. The company targets developers and blockchain users seeking enhanced security and uptime for their decentralized applications. Their market position is that of a niche provider emphasizing security and AI integration within blockchain infrastructure. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Gatsby and React, with integrations of popular analytics and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and a professional design, though some accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks publicly disclosed security policies or incident response information. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could enhance trust and compliance by publishing relevant policies and contact information.

Detected Technologies

Gatsby 4.24.6ReactGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarFacebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagAdRollSwiper.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

OMNIA Protocol leverages blockchain and AI technologies to offer secure RPC services and decentralized infrastructure for AI agents, positioning itself in the emerging DePIN market. Their business model appears to be service-based, offering access to blockchain nodes and staking platforms on Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain. The company maintains multiple subdomains for specialized services, indicating a modular approach. Their target customers include blockchain developers, AI researchers, and decentralized application users. The presence of staking services suggests revenue streams from DeFi and token-based incentives. The company’s partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but external links indicate integrations with major blockchain networks and social media engagement. Growth indicators include active marketing and staking platforms, though lack of detailed business info limits deeper analysis.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. Use of security headers is assumed but not explicitly confirmed. The absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program represents gaps in transparency and readiness. Tracking scripts and third-party integrations are present, which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. The lack of contact channels for security incidents (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) limits incident response effectiveness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved by formalizing policies and disclosure mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

OMNIA Protocol

Description:

Secure, private and compliant access to blockchain infrastructure. Generate your secure RPC for Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon and benefit from frontrunning protection.

Key Services:
Secure RPC generation for Ethereum and Layer 2 networksDePIN infrastructure for AI agentsFrontrunning protectionAI Brain platformStaking services on Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Gatsby 4.24.6ReactGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarFacebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagAdRollSwiper.js
Frameworks:
Gatsby
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (assumed)
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHotjarFacebook PixelLinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
AdRoll
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelHotjarLinkedIn Insight TagGoogle Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing Tools:
Hotjar
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=0; includeSubDomains; preload"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:hostmaster@omniatech.io

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 70 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:omniatech.io
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/15/2025 (70 days)
SANs:omniatech.io, cache-test.stage.omniatech.io

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: 6frbvwy7un6dfazit3copqkegewqe4vyfpkty7qkhqt2tvijlr6q.mx-verification.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(1447 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.72.32, 104.26.13.231, 104.26.12.231
AAAA Records:2606:4700:20::681a:ce7, 2606:4700:20::681a:de7, 2606:4700:20::ac43:4820
Name Servers:
johnny.ns.cloudflare.com
zainab.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
15: 6frbvwy7un6dfazit3copqkegewqe4vyfpkty7qkhqt2tvijlr6q.mx-verification.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382491170, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Gatsby, a modern React-based static site generator, ensuring good performance and SEO capabilities. Integration of analytics and marketing tools is comprehensive but should be balanced with privacy considerations. The site is mobile optimized and uses modern CSS and JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the site uses HTTPS and appears stable. Technical debt is low given the modern stack, but the absence of CMS or dynamic content management may limit rapid content updates. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and formalize security and privacy technical controls.
Analyze Another Website