Skip to main content

Is onebeauty.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - onebeauty.lv Reviews

O

Is onebeauty.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if onebeauty.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:15:20 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website onebeauty.lv currently presents a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page, blocking direct access to its main content. This indicates the site is protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) designed to prevent automated bot traffic and potential cyber threats. Due to this, no direct business information, contact details, or content beyond the CAPTCHA page is accessible. The page uses legacy CMS meta tags referencing Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, likely remnants or misconfigurations, and employs Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The security posture shows use of reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation but lacks visible security headers and WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting trust assessment. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible for full analysis and lacks publicly available privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Given the lack of accessible content, no definitive business intelligence can be derived. The domain name suggests a beauty-related business possibly targeting Latvian or European markets, but no explicit business model, market positioning, or services are presented. The absence of contact information and policies reduces credibility and transparency. The use of BitNinja WAF indicates a focus on security, but the outdated CMS references and minimal content suggest limited digital maturity or a site under maintenance or attack mitigation.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The site employs BitNinja WAF with a CAPTCHA challenge to block suspicious or automated traffic, which is a positive security control. However, no security headers were detected in the provided data, and WHOIS information is unavailable due to query limits, hindering domain legitimacy verification. The use of HTTPS is implied but not confirmed from the data. The site lacks visible privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is moderate but incomplete due to limited data and blocked access.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, etc.) to enhance protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

The website content is blocked by BitNinja security service presenting a CAPTCHA challenge to verify visitor legitimacy before granting access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

This page is a security CAPTCHA challenge page to verify visitors are not automated bots before allowing access to the requested content.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerreCAPTCHA v2
Frameworks:
Joomla! 1.5WordPress 2.5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently inaccessible beyond a security CAPTCHA challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:89.149.219.49 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.87 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 59 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:onebeauty.lv
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/28/2025 (59 days)
SANs:onebeauty.lv, *.onebeauty.lv

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.172.58, 104.21.30.70
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3035::6815:1e46, 2606:4700:3036::ac43:ac3a
Name Servers:
kimora.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
owen.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: mail.onebeauty.lv
SOA:Serial: 2376976039, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:89.149.219.49 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:212.7.207.87 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS platforms (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) as indicated by meta tags, which are outdated and potentially vulnerable. The presence of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts indicates standard visitor tracking. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation integrated via recaptcha.net. The page is mobile responsive to a basic degree but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO optimizations. Performance is moderate but cannot be fully assessed due to the WAF challenge. The hosting provider is not identified. The technical stack shows signs of aging and potential technical debt.
Analyze Another Website