Skip to main content

Is onerway.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Onerway Reviews

onerway.com favicon

Is onerway.com Safe? Security Analysis for Onerway

Check if onerway.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
JavaScriptVue.jsElement UIJivoSite widgetWeixin JS SDK
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 4:08:04 PM
64
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Onerway presents itself as a provider of secure and efficient payment and corporate banking solutions targeting global businesses. The website content is focused on financial services, emphasizing global reach and security. The technical infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js and UI libraries like Element UI, with integration of third-party chat support via JivoSite and Weixin JS SDK for social features. However, the website lacks critical compliance and security features such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and visible security headers. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Overall, while the business proposition is clear, the digital maturity and security posture require significant improvement to build trust and ensure compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptVue.jsElement UIJivoSite widgetWeixin JS SDK

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets the finance sector, specifically payment and corporate banking services for global businesses. The business model appears to be service-oriented, focusing on providing secure payment infrastructure and banking solutions. The lack of detailed company information, contact details, and certifications limits the ability to assess market positioning and competitive advantages fully. The website's minimal content and absence of trust indicators suggest a small or early-stage operation. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The integration of chat support indicates an intent to engage customers directly, but overall business intelligence is limited by sparse publicly available information.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is low based on the available data. The website does not demonstrate implementation of essential security headers, lacks visible HTTPS/SSL configuration details, and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The use of third-party scripts introduces potential risks that are not mitigated by visible security controls. The absence of WHOIS registration data further undermines trust and raises suspicion. Immediate actions are needed to enhance security posture, including SSL enforcement, security header deployment, and publication of compliance policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and verify its configuration.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Onerway

Description:

ONERWAY offers global businesses secure and efficient payment and corporate banking solutions worldwide.

Key Services:
secure payment solutionscorporate banking solutions
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptVue.jsElement UIJivoSite widgetWeixin JS SDK
Frameworks:
Vue.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
JivoSite
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable or domain unregistered

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'mail' uses 384-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(384-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

80/100
Score

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.onerway.com
Issuer:DigiCert TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid Until:11/7/2025 (97 days)
SANs:*.onerway.com, onerway.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:23.216.134.211, 23.216.134.214
AAAA Records:2a02:26f0:9b00::213:b0c9, 2a02:26f0:9b00::213:b0d0
Name Servers:
a1-52.akam.netDNS only
a20-65.akam.netDNS only
a22-66.akam.netDNS only
a3-66.akam.netDNS only
a5-64.akam.netDNS only
a8-64.akam.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: onerway-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2024123048, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:76ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Vue.js and Element UI, indicating a contemporary approach to UI development. External scripts include JivoSite for live chat and Weixin JS SDK for social integration. The site appears moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the data. The absence of security headers and SSL details suggests technical debt in security implementation. The site would benefit from performance audits and security hardening to reduce risks and improve user trust.
Analyze Another Website