Skip to main content

Is onkologi.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Latvijas Onkologu asociācija Reviews

onkologi.lv favicon

Is onkologi.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Latvijas Onkologu asociācija

Check if onkologi.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareLatviasmall
WordPressPHPjQueryBootstrapSlider Revolution+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:09:51 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Latvijas Onkologu asociācija is a professional non-profit organization uniting oncology and related medical specialists in Latvia. The website serves as an information and communication platform for oncology professionals, patients, and partners. It provides organizational details, news, events, and contact information. The site is built on WordPress using popular page builders and plugins, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The technical infrastructure supports responsive design and modern web standards, though some SEO and accessibility improvements are possible. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy compliance documentation. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices to align with GDPR and industry best practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPressPHPjQueryBootstrapSlider RevolutionElementorWPBakery Page Builder

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The association holds a clear market position as the national oncology professional body in Latvia, targeting medical specialists and patients. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on professional networking, education, and support. The website content reflects a well-structured organization with visible leadership and member information. There is no evidence of commercial activities or revenue streams on the site. The partnership ecosystem appears limited to internal stakeholders. Growth indicators are not explicit but the presence of news and events suggests active engagement. The site lacks social media integration, which could be an area for strategic expansion.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@onkologi.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712821****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and login/registration forms are present with standard protections. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency. There is no visible security.txt or dedicated security contact. Compliance with GDPR is not clearly documented, and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. These gaps represent compliance and risk management weaknesses that should be addressed to improve security culture and regulatory adherence.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Latvijas Onkologu asociācija

Description:

Latvijas Onkologu asociācija is a voluntary professional organization uniting oncology specialists in Latvia including oncologists, surgeons, chemotherapists, radiologists, gynecologists, urologists, and other related specialists regardless of citizenship, nationality, religious or political beliefs.

Key Services:
Professional networkingInformation disseminationSupport for oncology specialistsPatient information
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressPHPjQueryBootstrapSlider RevolutionElementorWPBakery Page Builder
Frameworks:
WordPress CMSElementorWPBakery
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure login and registration forms

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional association site for oncology specialists in Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mail.hostinger.com ~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:84.32.84.17, 84.32.84.13
AAAA Records:2a02:4780:1a:deb1:9ead:f2da:9cff:bca3, 2a02:4780:19:1fe5:acc3:8429:c2de:666b
Name Servers:
ns1.dns-parking.comDNS only
ns2.dns-parking.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx2.hostinger.lv
5: mx1.hostinger.lv

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and WPBakery page builders, Slider Revolution for visual content, and Bootstrap for responsive design. The technology stack is modern but includes multiple page builders which may increase maintenance complexity. Performance is moderate with caching and optimization plugins implied but not explicitly confirmed. Mobile optimization is good with responsive layouts. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website