Is ontrac.com Safe? Security Analysis for OnTrac
Check if ontrac.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
OnTrac is a large regional last-mile delivery company specializing in e-commerce parcel delivery across 35 states and Washington D.C. The company focuses on fast, reliable, and cost-effective delivery solutions for retailers and shippers, positioning itself as a key player in the US transportation and logistics sector. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern technologies and integrations for analytics, marketing, and customer engagement. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure form handling, though some security headers and incident response disclosures are absent. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable gap but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional website and active social media presence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing vulnerability disclosure information, and improving accessibility compliance.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
OnTrac operates in the transportation and e-commerce delivery sectors, targeting retailers, shippers, and delivery professionals. Its business model centers on last-mile delivery services with a large geographic footprint and a focus on speed and cost savings. The company leverages partnerships and offers opportunities for delivery service providers. The website showcases trusted client logos and a knowledge center, indicating a focus on thought leadership and customer education. Marketing and analytics tools are well integrated, supporting data-driven growth strategies. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional online presence, supporting high trustworthiness and market credibility.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses reputable third-party scripts for analytics and marketing. Contact forms are implemented securely via a popular WordPress plugin. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which is a gap in transparency and security culture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional best practices and disclosures.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
OnTrac
OnTrac helps retailers and shippers with fast, flexible reliable last-mile delivery that reaches 70% of the US population in 31 states & D.C.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of security and analytics scripts from reputable sources
- Secure form handling via Contact Form 7 plugin
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, health, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Complex SPF record
LOWToo many include statements can cause lookup limits
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings