Skip to main content

Is opendatacommons.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Open Knowledge Foundation Reviews

O

Is opendatacommons.org Safe? Security Analysis for Open Knowledge Foundation

Check if opendatacommons.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Kingdomsmall
HTML5CSSJavaScriptCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 9:57:35 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Open Data Commons, maintained by the Open Knowledge Foundation, is a non-profit organization providing legal tools and licenses to facilitate the publication and use of open data. The website serves as a resource hub offering licenses such as the Open Database License (ODbL), Attribution License (ODC-By), and Public Domain Dedication and License (PDDL), targeting open data publishers, users, and legal professionals. The organization is well-established with a domain age dating back to 2006, reflecting its longstanding presence in the open data community. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and the Mmenu.js library for navigation. It uses Cloudflare for DNS services and serves content over HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. The site is moderately performant, mobile-optimized, and includes privacy-conscious analytics via Plausible. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and some security headers are missing, representing areas for improvement. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a solid baseline with HTTPS and domain transfer protection but lacks publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies linked, and minimal user tracking. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with its mission. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance security posture and trust.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSSJavaScriptCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Open Data Commons operates within the open data and legal tools sector as a non-profit entity under the Open Knowledge Foundation. Its market positioning is strong in the niche of open data licensing, providing authoritative licenses and guidance. The business model focuses on community and legal support rather than commercial revenue. Target customers include data publishers, legal professionals, and open data users globally. The organization benefits from a reputable parent entity and a consistent brand presence. Growth indicators include active community forums and multiple social media channels. Partnerships are primarily with the Open Knowledge Foundation and related open data initiatives. The website content and structure support its mission effectively, though expansion of security and compliance transparency could further strengthen market confidence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@okfn.org

Company Registration

Legal Name:

Open Knowledge Foundation

VAT Number:

GB 984404989

Registration Number:

05133759

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced with a valid SSL certificate, and domain transfer protections are in place. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security are absent, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface. The absence of a public security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is well addressed, and analytics usage is privacy-conscious. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but could be improved with enhanced DNS security, security headers, and published security governance documents.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Open Knowledge Foundation

Description:

Open Data Commons is the home of a set of legal tools and licenses to help you publish, provide and use open data.

Key Services:
Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL)Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By)Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License (PDDL)Guides and FAQs on open data licensing
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSSJavaScriptCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Mmenu.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Plausible Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
plausible.io
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:opendatacommons.org
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/4/2025 (32 days)
SANs:opendatacommons.org, *.opendatacommons.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
18 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(399 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.73.34, 172.67.157.113
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3031::ac43:9d71, 2606:4700:3035::6815:4922
Name Servers:
carl.ns.cloudflare.com
dana.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2381766023, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:74ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a custom or unknown CMS with a clean HTML5 and CSS implementation. It uses the Mmenu.js library for responsive navigation and loads fonts from an external CDN. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS services, though no direct hosting provider is identified. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive navigation and viewport settings. SEO is supported by meta description tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and landmarks. No broken links or errors were detected. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which are recommended for mitigation.
Analyze Another Website