Is openfontlicense.org Safe? Security Analysis for SIL Language Technology
Check if openfontlicense.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The SIL Open Font License website is operated by SIL Language Technology, a division of SIL International, a global non-profit organization focused on language development and open source font licensing. The website provides comprehensive resources about the SIL Open Font License, including official license texts, FAQs, font showcases, and historical context. It targets font designers, developers, and the open source community, positioning itself as a trusted authority in open font licensing. Technically, the site is built using the Hugo static site generator with Bootstrap and jQuery libraries, hosted and registered via Cloudflare. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and moderate performance. However, it lacks some modern security headers and DNSSEC, which could enhance its security posture. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, but does not publish explicit security policies or incident response contacts. There is no cookie consent mechanism, which limits GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the site is secure but could improve transparency and compliance. The overall risk is low given the non-profit nature and content focus, but strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response documentation are recommended to enhance trust and resilience.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
SIL Language Technology operates within the non-profit sector, providing open font licensing and language development resources globally. Its competitive advantage lies in its established reputation, community-approved licensing model, and affiliation with SIL International. The business model is based on open source collaboration and community engagement rather than direct revenue. Target customers include font designers, software developers, and language professionals. Growth is supported by ongoing community contributions and partnerships. The organization maintains a clear partnership ecosystem with SIL International as the parent entity, reinforcing credibility and operational stability.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The lack of incident response contact channels and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited readiness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR is partial due to missing cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but should be enhanced to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
SIL Language Technology
SIL is a global, faith-based nonprofit that works with local communities worldwide to develop language solutions including research, translation, training, and materials development. The website hosts the SIL Open Font License, a free, libre, and open source license designed specifically for fonts and related software.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Domain status clientTransferProhibited
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 69 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings