Skip to main content

Is openjsf.org a Scam? Security Check Results - The Linux Foundation Reviews

openjsf.org favicon

Is openjsf.org Safe? Security Analysis for The Linux Foundation

Check if openjsf.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Stateslarge
ReactNext.jsPrismic CMSGoogle AnalyticsVercel hosting
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:09:15 AM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The OpenJS Foundation, operated under The Linux Foundation, serves as a central hub for the collaborative development and widespread adoption of JavaScript and web technologies globally. It supports numerous key open source JavaScript projects, provides community collaboration spaces, and offers training and events to foster growth and innovation in the JavaScript ecosystem. The foundation enjoys strong backing from major technology companies, reflecting its significant market position in the open source and developer communities. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack including React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, and managed with Prismic CMS. It demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user insights while maintaining a professional and user-friendly design. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and maintains domain transfer protections, though it lacks DNSSEC and some advanced security headers. The presence of a dedicated security page and comprehensive legal policies reflects a commitment to security and compliance, although explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Privacy compliance is generally good, with clear privacy and cookie policies, but the lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a minor gap. Overall, the OpenJS Foundation website presents a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical maturity. It effectively supports its mission to promote JavaScript technologies while maintaining a secure and compliant online presence. Strategic improvements in DNS security and privacy consent mechanisms would further enhance its security posture and compliance standing.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsPrismic CMSGoogle AnalyticsVercel hosting

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The OpenJS Foundation operates as a non-profit entity under The Linux Foundation, focusing on the JavaScript technology sector. It leverages a membership-based business model, engaging major industry players such as Google, IBM, Meta, and Microsoft. The foundation's revenue streams likely include membership fees, training programs, and event sponsorships. Its target customers are developers, enterprises, and open source communities invested in JavaScript technologies. The foundation's competitive advantage lies in its central role in uniting diverse JavaScript projects and fostering collaboration. Growth indicators include active project hosting, community engagement, and regular events like JSConf. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving multiple technology leaders and collaboration spaces. Operationally, the foundation maintains a strong digital presence with modern infrastructure and comprehensive governance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The OpenJS Foundation exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, domain transfer protections, and a dedicated security information page. However, the absence of DNSSEC and certain security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS represents areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. The lack of explicit incident response contacts and a security.txt file limits transparency in vulnerability management. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but cookie consent mechanisms are not implemented, which could pose compliance risks. Overall, the foundation demonstrates good security hygiene but should address these gaps to enhance resilience and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

The Linux Foundation

Description:

OpenJS promotes the widespread adoption and continued development of key JavaScript technologies worldwide.

Key Services:
Project hosting and supportCommunity collaborationTraining and eventsMembership services
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsPrismic CMSGoogle AnalyticsVercel hosting
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Vercel
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Security page present

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerVercel Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well maintained.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "1"

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:8112310.spf10.hubspotemail.net include:amazonses.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@openjsf.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(169 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns1.dnsimple.com
ns2.dnsimple-edge.net
ns3.dnsimple.com
ns4.dnsimple-edge.org
MX Records:
10: mx1.forwardemail.net
10: mx2.forwardemail.net
SOA:Serial: 1550862803, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:76ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:8112310.spf10.hubspotemail.net include:amazonses.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using a modern React and Next.js framework, leveraging server-side rendering and static site generation for performance optimization. It uses Prismic as a headless CMS, enabling flexible content management. Hosting is provided by Vercel, known for fast global CDN delivery and scalability. The site includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, integrated asynchronously to minimize performance impact. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility are well implemented, with semantic HTML and ARIA roles evident. The site uses optimized images with srcset for responsive loading. No technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and DNS configurations to further reduce risk.
Analyze Another Website