Skip to main content

Is openstreetmap.org a Scam? Security Check Results - OpenStreetMap Foundation Reviews

openstreetmap.org favicon

Is openstreetmap.org Safe? Security Analysis for OpenStreetMap Foundation

Check if openstreetmap.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
JavaScriptLeaflet.jsTurbo.jsBootstrapSVG icons
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 10:22:09 AM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

OpenStreetMap is a globally recognized non-profit organization providing a free, editable map of the world created by a community of contributors. The platform serves a broad audience including general users, developers, and mapping enthusiasts. It operates under an open license model supported by donations and corporate memberships, positioning itself as a leader in open geospatial data. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Leaflet.js for mapping, Turbo.js for dynamic page updates, and is hosted on Fastly's CDN infrastructure, ensuring fast and responsive user experience across devices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses CSRF tokens, and implements content security policies, reflecting a mature security posture. However, it lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms and a public vulnerability disclosure policy, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the domain and website appear legitimate and trustworthy, though WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is justified for this type of organization.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptLeaflet.jsTurbo.jsBootstrapSVG icons

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

OpenStreetMap operates as a non-profit entity in the technology sector, focusing on open geospatial data and community-driven mapping services. Its business model relies on community contributions, corporate sponsorships, and donations. The platform enjoys a strong market position as the leading open-source mapping project, with a global user base and active contributor community. The website links to partner organizations such as Fastly and the OpenStreetMap Foundation, indicating a robust partnership ecosystem. The absence of direct contact information on the main site suggests a focus on community engagement rather than direct commercial sales. Growth indicators include ongoing events like State of the Map and continuous platform enhancements. Strategic observations highlight the importance of enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency to maintain trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforcement, use of security headers including Content-Security-Policy with nonce, and CSRF protection on forms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The use of Matomo analytics indicates a privacy-conscious approach to user tracking. However, the lack of a published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency and incident response readiness. No contact channels for security incidents were found. Compliance with GDPR is partial, with privacy and cookie policies present but lacking explicit consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing incident response and improving privacy controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a clear cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

OpenStreetMap Foundation

Description:

OpenStreetMap is a free wiki world map created by contributors worldwide and free to use under an open license.

Key Services:
Map data provisionMap editing toolsRouting servicesCommunity engagement
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptLeaflet.jsTurbo.jsBootstrapSVG icons
Frameworks:
Turbo (Hotwire)
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens present
  • Secure forms
  • No exposed sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Matomo
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

73/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:184.104.226.98 ip6:2001:470:1:b3b::2 ip4:87.252.214.98 ip6:2001:4d78:fe03:1c::2 ip4:193.60.236.0/24 ip4:82.199.86.96/27 ip6:2001:4d78:500:5e3::/64 ip4:87.252.214.96/27 ip6:2001:4d78:fe03:1c::/64 ip4:184.104.179.128/27 ip6:2001:470:1:fa1::/64 ip 4:184.104.226.96/27 ip6:2001:470:1:b3b::/64 mx -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:openstreetmap-d@dmarc.report-uri.com
MTA-STS Details
Mode:enforce
Max Age:365 days

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:openstreetmap.org
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/18/2025 (75 days)
SANs:openstreetmap.org, *.openstreetmap.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1433 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.88.66, 172.67.173.161
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::ac43:ada1, 2606:4700:3034::6815:5842
Name Servers:
daisy.ns.cloudflare.com
rajeev.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: a.mx.openstreetmap.org
SOA:Serial: 2382381118, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:45ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:184.104.226.98 ip6:2001:470:1:b3b::2 ip4:87.252.214.98 ip6:2001:4d78:fe03:1c::2 ip4:193.60.236.0/24 ip4:82.199.86.96/27 ip6:2001:4d78:500:5e3::/64 ip4:87.252.214.96/27 ip6:2001:4d78:fe03:1c::/64 ip4:184.104.179.128/27 ip6:2001:470:1:fa1::/64 ip 4:184.104.226.96/27 ip6:2001:470:1:b3b::/64 mx -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern and efficient technology stack including JavaScript frameworks like Leaflet.js for interactive maps and Turbo.js for dynamic page updates. Hosting on Fastly CDN ensures fast content delivery and scalability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Performance is fast with no broken elements or errors observed. Technical risks are minimal, but the absence of explicit privacy and security disclosures could pose compliance risks. Opportunities exist to further modernize privacy controls and enhance security transparency.
Analyze Another Website