Skip to main content

Is openweathermap.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Openweather Ltd. Reviews

openweathermap.org favicon

Is openweathermap.org Safe? Security Analysis for Openweather Ltd.

Check if openweathermap.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Kingdommedium
Bootstrap 3.4.1Font Awesome 4.7.0Google Fonts (Oswald, Roboto)Google AnalyticsRaven.js (Sentry error tracking)+3 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 3:35:45 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Openweather Ltd., operating the OpenWeatherMap platform, is a well-established UK-based company founded in 2012 that provides comprehensive weather data services globally. Their offerings include current, forecast, and historical weather data accessible via a variety of APIs, specialized dashboards for energy and extreme weather, and interactive weather maps. The company targets developers and businesses requiring reliable and detailed meteorological data, positioning itself as a leading technology provider in the weather data industry. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive content relevant to its audience. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap, Vue.js, and integrates Google Analytics and Sentry for monitoring. Hosting is inferred to be on Amazon AWS, supported by AWS DNS servers. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in explicit security headers and DNS security. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited domain status, indicating domain security awareness. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published. The cookie consent mechanism complies with GDPR, and privacy policies are comprehensive. No critical vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were found, but improvements in security headers and vulnerability disclosure would enhance the security posture. Overall, OpenWeatherMap demonstrates a strong business and technical foundation with high trustworthiness and compliance. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and DNS security would further solidify its position and reduce risk exposure.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 3.4.1Font Awesome 4.7.0Google Fonts (Oswald, Roboto)Google AnalyticsRaven.js (Sentry error tracking)Leaflet.js (mapping)Custom JavaScript bundlesVue.js (inferred from data-v- scoped styles)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Openweather Ltd. holds a strong market position as a global provider of weather data APIs and dashboards, serving a diverse clientele including developers, businesses in renewable energy, agriculture, and risk management. Their business model revolves around subscription-based API access with freemium tiers and pay-as-you-call options, supplemented by specialized dashboards and marketplace data products. The company leverages partnerships and maintains an active ecosystem with related domains and services. Growth indicators include extensive API usage, a large network of weather stations, and integration with major platforms like Google AdWords. The company’s transparent WHOIS data and long domain age support its credibility. Strategic observations suggest continued expansion in specialized industry solutions and enhanced data offerings.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@openweathermap.org

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of OpenWeatherMap is solid but not without gaps. HTTPS is enforced site-wide, and domain registration protections are in place. The use of Sentry for error monitoring indicates proactive incident detection. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security policy or vulnerability disclosure mechanism was found, which may hinder coordinated vulnerability management. The cookie consent banner and privacy policy demonstrate GDPR compliance, but incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible. Overall, the site is secure for general use but would benefit from enhanced DNS security, published security policies, and explicit security headers to mitigate advanced threats.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Openweather Ltd.

Description:

OpenWeather provides comprehensive weather data services, including current, forecast, and historical weather information. Offers APIs for solar radiation, road risk assessment, solar energy prediction, and more with global coverage.

Key Services:
Current weather dataForecast data (minute, hourly, daily, climatic)Historical weather dataWeather mapsSpecialized dashboards (Energy, Extreme Weather, General Weather Dashboard)Widgets and marketplace
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 3.4.1Font Awesome 4.7.0Google Fonts (Oswald, Roboto)Google AnalyticsRaven.js (Sentry error tracking)Leaflet.js (mapping)Custom JavaScript bundlesVue.js (inferred from data-v- scoped styles)
Frameworks:
BootstrapVue.js
Platforms:
WebMobile (Android and iOS apps)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/opt-out

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsSentry (Raven.js)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website provides extensive weather data services with multiple API offerings and dashboards.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

95/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:servers.mcsv.net ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1352-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@openweathermap.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: aspmx1.googlemail.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
13 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(226 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:148.251.136.139
Name Servers:
ns-1288.awsdns-33.org
ns-1790.awsdns-31.co.uk
ns-456.awsdns-57.com
ns-536.awsdns-03.net
MX Records:
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
40: aspmx2.googlemail.com
30: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
50: aspmx3.googlemail.com
40: aspmx1.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:92ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:servers.mcsv.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design and Vue.js for frontend interactivity. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and Sentry for error monitoring. Hosting is likely on Amazon AWS, supported by AWS DNS servers. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a professional design. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization in loading times and accessibility improvements. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and incomplete security header implementation, which could be addressed to improve overall resilience.
Analyze Another Website