Skip to main content

Is operate.so a Scam? Security Check Results - Operate Reviews

operate.so favicon

Is operate.so Safe? Security Analysis for Operate

Check if operate.so is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsVercel Analytics
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 1:02:00 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Operate is a newly launched SaaS CRM platform designed specifically for founders and sales teams seeking a streamlined, efficient sales tool. The product emphasizes precision, customer feedback integration, and deal momentum management to help users close deals faster and with more confidence. The website reflects a modern, well-designed digital presence built on React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast performance and mobile responsiveness. Security practices are solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security or privacy policies are published. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and published contact/security policies.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsVercel Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets startup founders and sales professionals with a niche CRM solution that differentiates itself by focusing on simplicity, speed, and actionable customer feedback. The business model is SaaS subscription-based, with early access programs indicating a growth-oriented, community-driven approach. The market position is that of a specialized CRM alternative to bloated, generic tools. The lack of extensive contact information or certifications suggests a small, early-stage company. The product's integration with customer feedback and deal momentum tracking offers competitive advantages in the CRM space.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

h*****@operate.so

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited domain status, indicating good baseline security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is found, and no incident response contacts are published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap, especially for GDPR. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but lacks comprehensive transparency and formal policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Operate

Description:

Operate is a precision-built CRM tool designed to help founders and sales teams cut through noise with smart defaults, fast workflows, and zero fluff. It emphasizes customer feedback integration, deal momentum, and ease of use.

Key Services:
CRM for salesCustomer feedback trackingDeal momentum management
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsVercel Analytics
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Vercel
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Vercel Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Vercel Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Vercel Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a modern SaaS CRM product targeting founders and sales teams.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 52 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

55/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: ygbtwwk4t3owu26plt7jg6ugcxy5tgf4hgu6p32wjvhk24yun64q.mx-verification.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(170 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
dns1.p08.nsone.net
dns2.p08.nsone.net
dns3.p08.nsone.net
dns4.p08.nsone.net
MX Records:
15: ygbtwwk4t3owu26plt7jg6ugcxy5tgf4hgu6p32wjvhk24yun64q.mx-verification.google.com
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1709014155, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:63ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, which provides fast loading times and good scalability. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with semantic HTML and proper meta tags. The use of Vercel Analytics indicates minimal user tracking. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom-built frontend. The technical implementation is clean and modern, with opportunities to improve SEO and accessibility further by adding structured data and ARIA roles.
Analyze Another Website