Skip to main content

Is orangedao.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - Orange DAO Reviews

orangedao.xyz favicon

Is orangedao.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Orange DAO

Check if orangedao.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFramer
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:13:26 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Orange DAO is a niche community platform targeting crypto founders, aiming to provide a collaborative environment for networking and growth within the blockchain space. The website is built using the Framer platform and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking. While the design is modern and mobile-optimized, the site lacks critical compliance elements such as privacy and cookie policies, terms of service, and contact information, which are essential for trust and regulatory adherence. Security posture is minimal with no detected security headers or incident response contacts, indicating room for improvement in protecting user data and ensuring compliance. Overall, the site presents a basic but functional presence in the crypto community sector, with moderate risk due to transparency and compliance gaps.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFramer

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business positions itself as a specialized community for crypto founders, likely monetizing through membership or community services. The target audience is clearly crypto entrepreneurs and enthusiasts. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical for crypto projects but reduces transparency. The lack of detailed business information, certifications, or contact details limits the ability to fully assess credibility. The site relies on modern front-end technology but lacks deeper integrations or partner disclosures. Growth potential depends on community engagement and trust-building through enhanced transparency and compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity is low, with no visible security headers or policies. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which could delay response to security incidents. The use of HTTPS is assumed but not confirmed from provided data. The site uses Google Analytics, which requires proper consent mechanisms that are missing. Overall, the security posture exposes the business to regulatory and reputational risks.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Orange DAO

Description:

Join The Best Founder Community In Crypto

Key Services:
founder community engagementnetworking in crypto space
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFramer
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a crypto founder community platform with basic content and limited business information.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1096-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1152-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:rua@dmarc.brevo.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(385 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:31.43.160.6, 31.43.161.6
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-a1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-a2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-a3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-a4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 118, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:159ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Framer platform, leveraging modern web fonts and Google Analytics for tracking. The technical implementation is clean but basic, with no advanced CMS or backend detected. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but no structured JSON-LD schema detected. The site lacks accessibility features beyond basic compliance. Hosting appears to be via Framer's infrastructure. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of compliance mechanisms which could impact user trust and regulatory standing.
Analyze Another Website