Skip to main content

Is osp.kitchen a Scam? Security Check Results - Open Source Publishing Reviews

O

Is osp.kitchen Safe? Security Analysis for Open Source Publishing

Check if osp.kitchen is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
jQuery 1.11.0JavaScriptCSSSVG
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 2:10:47 AM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Open Source Publishing (OSP) operates a niche platform dedicated to open source publishing projects, emphasizing copyleft principles and collaborative cultural work. The website presents a variety of projects, tools, workshops, and research initiatives, targeting artists, cultural workers, and the open source community. The business model revolves around sharing and improving open source publishing resources and projects. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.11.0 and standard web technologies such as CSS and SVG. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO features. Security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities but lacks HTTPS confirmation and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting trust and compliance. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions and privacy protection, but the domain is actively maintained. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but requires improvements in security, privacy, and compliance to enhance trust and professionalism.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.11.0JavaScriptCSSSVG

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

OSP holds a unique position in the open source publishing niche, offering tools, workshops, and research to a specialized audience. Its competitive advantage lies in transparency and copyleft licensing, fostering community collaboration. Revenue streams are unclear but likely non-commercial or grant-based given the open source ethos. The partnership ecosystem includes references to cultural institutions like iMAL. Growth indicators include recent project updates and active blog posts. The business operates on a small scale with a focused community presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers is a significant gap. The use of an outdated jQuery version may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. Lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness is not evident due to missing contact channels for security issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Open Source Publishing

Description:

Open Source Publishing (OSP) is a platform focused on publishing projects with an open source philosophy. It offers tools, foundry, workshops, research, and live projects related to open source publishing. The site encourages studying, improving, redistributing, and releasing improvements under copyleft principles.

Key Services:
Publishing toolsWorkshopsFoundry (likely font or design related)Research projectsLive projectsBlog content
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.11.0JavaScriptCSSSVG
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
StatCounter
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
StatCounter
Tracking Pixels:
StatCounter
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and active project updates.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:79.99.201.139 a:lists.osp.kitchen include:_mailcust.gandi.net ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 8 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

19 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:37.34.55.224
Name Servers:
ns-137-c.gandi.netDNS only
ns-195-a.gandi.netDNS only
ns-90-b.gandi.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: spool.mail.gandi.net
50: fb.mail.gandi.net

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:79.99.201.139 a:lists.osp.kitchen include:_mailcust.gandi.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic web technologies including jQuery 1.11.0, CSS, and SVG graphics. The HTML structure is valid but lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications. Performance is moderate with some mobile optimization but limited accessibility features. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the data. The site uses StatCounter for analytics, indicating minimal user tracking. Technical debt includes outdated libraries and missing security best practices.
Analyze Another Website